Laserfiche WebLink
C) -- 1 ;--''3 .TIDE 1 3 2 4. C3 ka <br />Iireevlearae.t. According to the Subdivision Ordinance, side <br />lot lines rust be substantially at right angles to straight street <br />lines or radial to curved street lines. As shown on Exhibit C, <br />Lots 6, and 7 all hold irregular lot shapes and fail to meet the <br />cited Ordinance requirement. To accommodate the proposed lot <br />shapes, the processing of a variance will be necessary considering <br />the physical constraints of the subject site (wetlands, topography) <br />justification appears to exist to warrant such a variance. <br />Setbacks. The following setbacks are imposed in R-1 zoning <br />Districts: <br />Front Yard <br />Side Yard <br />Rear Yard <br />pe r ,_Set'back <br />30 feet <br />10 feet <br />30 feet <br />All proposed lots hold an ability to enforce required setbacks <br />while providing ample area for home construction. To demonstrate <br />lot buildability, specific house pad locations have been <br />appropriately illustrated in the sketch plan. <br />Gut -a -, The subject property is to be accessed via a westerly <br />extension of Aspen Lane. Considering that the proposed cul-de-sac <br />originates at the intersection of Aspen Lane and Killdeer Drive ( <br />140 feet east of the subject property), the proposed cul-de-sac <br />measures e 570 feet in length. According to the Subdivision <br />Ordinance, cul-de-sacs must not exceed 500 feet in length. To <br />accommodate the proposed cul-de-sac length, the processing of <br />either a FDO, planned Development Overlay or a variance will be <br />necessary. Considering the physical features of the site, there <br />would appear to be justification for the granting of a variance. <br />Easements. As shown on the submitted sketch plan, a large lowland/ <br />wetland lies in the southwestern portion of the subject property. <br />According to the Subdivision Ordinance, water courses must be <br />protected by easements within abutting lots. So as to fully comply <br />with this Ordinance provision, all wetlands should be designated as <br />easements within adjacent lots. This item should be subject to <br />further comment by the City Engineer. <br />Ear /nT,ai� ni. an , <br />onThe submitted sketch plan illustrates trail <br />locations between Lots 1 and 2 and to the southwest of Lots 2 and <br />3. The Park Board should provide comment in regard to the <br />acceptability of the trail locations as well as appropriate park <br />dedication. <br />Drir wavy. As shown on the submitted sketch plan, Lots 6 and 7 are <br />to be accessed via adjacent driveways. In no case may the said <br />driveways be allowed to lie within required drainage or utility <br />easements. This -item should be subject to further comment by the <br />City Engineer. <br />4 <br />