My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/13/1993 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
1993
>
10/13/1993 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2017 12:17:40 PM
Creation date
7/7/2017 12:19:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
10/13/1993
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Density. Within R-1 Zoning Districts, the maximum number of <br />dwelling units per buildable acre must not exceed 3.2. While the <br />subject subdivision entails 9.3 acres, only 3.3 acres are <br />considered buildable. With a density of 2.73 units per buildable <br />acre, the proposed subdivision meets R-1 density requirements. <br />Lot Area Lots within is -1 Zoning Districts must exhibit lot areas <br />not less than 10,800 square feet in size. This requirement <br />excludes area below the 100 year flood elevation and designated <br />wetlands. Mi lots have been found to exhibit at least 10,800 <br />contiguous square feet of buildable lot area. <br />Lilt Width, Within the R-1 Zoning District, a minimum lot width of <br />80 feet is required. While, all proposed lots have been found to <br />meet Ordinance width requirements, lot frontage on Lots 6, 7, and <br />8 is devoted almost exclusively to wetlands. <br />According to the Subdivision Ordinance, lots with easements <br />protecting watercourses shall have sufficient dimensions and area <br />above normal water levels to equal or exceed the minimums specified <br />in the applicable district provisions. <br />In this regard, Lots 6, 7, and 8 of the proposed subdivision may or <br />may not comply with the cited Ordinance provision, depending on <br />interpretation. If the Ordinance provision is understood to meat <br />that "sufficient dimensions" refers to the lot having ample <br />buildable area dimensions so as to construct a home, then the <br />referenced lets would comply with the Ordinance standard. <br />If on the other hand, the provision is understood to mean that the <br />required 80 foot lot width (road frontage) must exclude wetland <br />areas, then an Ordinance violation would appear to exist and an <br />alternative wetland mitigation plan should be considered. <br />Although the applicant is requesting a unique lot design for Lots <br />6 and 7, their design is responsive to the current wetland <br />preservation rules. Both lots exceed lot area standards and <br />provide buildable area outside adjacent wetlands and floodplains. <br />Due to the physical constraints of the site, we would recommend <br />that the Planning Commission give positive consideration to the <br />design Of Lots 6 and 7. <br />Tree Preservation The submitted <br />exist throughout the subject site. <br />significant trees should be pre <br />inventory of existing trees may be <br />concept plan notes that trees <br />To the extent possible, all <br />served. In this regard, an <br />necessary. <br />Wetland Mitiq t.9ma As shown on the submitted concept plan, <br />wetland mitigation will be necessary to achieve the proposed <br />subdivision design. The proposed mitigation plan should be subject <br />to review and comment by the Rice Creek Watershed District. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.