My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/12/1995 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1995
>
06/12/1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2017 10:52:23 AM
Creation date
7/7/2017 1:34:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/12/1995
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Closed Council Meeting <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />COUNCIL MINUTES <br />July 26, 1993 <br />EMBERS PRESENT. Reinert, Neal, Kuether, Elliott, Bergesc <br />EMBERS ABSENT;:. Nave <br />Staff members present: City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; City <br />Administrator, Randy Schumacher and Clerk -Treasurer Marilyn <br />Anderson. <br />The purpose of the closed session was to discuss the Reshanau <br />Park Estates Homeowner's Association (RPEHA) litigation. <br />Mr. Hawkins explained that Mr. Schumacher and a City Council <br />member have been informed of allegations that he, acting as the <br />City Attorney, made to the attorney for the RPEHA. Mr. Hawkins <br />told the City Council that from the beginning of the boat launch <br />matter, he has told the City Council that they have the right to <br />deny the request for the boat launch. This opinion was given in <br />writing and remains his opinion today. <br />Mr. Hawkins explained that there are certain sanctions applied to <br />City Attorneys. He read these sanctions. Mr. Hawkins explained <br />that the allegations are absolutely nonsense. He has 20 years of <br />experience in this field and knows how to hand litigation. He <br />explained that he never even remotely indicated that the City's <br />case is frivolous. <br />Council Member Kuether explained that the word "frivolous" was <br />used in a conversation she had with a RPEHA Member. She told the <br />RPEHA Member that her attorney should come before the City <br />Council and relate this information. <br />Mr. Hawkins said that he was "extremely distraught" that this <br />allegation was brought up at a public meeting (July 21, 1993 <br />Council Work Session) especially after it was explained that the <br />allegation was completely untrue. He said that since the City is <br />involved in a lawsuit on the matter, the City Council and staff <br />PAGE 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.