My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/12/1995 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1995
>
06/12/1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2017 10:52:23 AM
Creation date
7/7/2017 1:34:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/12/1995
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 25, 1994 <br />Council and is asking for a guarantee. <br />Council Member Elliott explained that she received a telephone <br />call and the caller indicated that Mr. Birch may settle out of <br />court with Mr. Art Hawkins. <br />Council Member Bergeson questioned the information in Mr. <br />Brixius' analysis asking if Mr. Brixius had confirmed the acreage <br />available for subdivision and the ordinary high water mark. Mr. <br />Brixius explained where he obtained his information. He further <br />explained he felt that going through the permit process would <br />verify the information and requiring wetland delineation would <br />help determine the number of lots to be realized from the 45.23 <br />acres. Council Member Bergeson asked Mr. Schneider if he had a <br />method of determining the number of acres above the ordinary high <br />water mark. Mr. Schneider said yes, but he would be unable to <br />identify any additional wetlands. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked Mr. Hawkins if the City Council <br />could legally act on Mr. Birch's proposal without going through <br />the Planing and Zoning and the entire process. Mr. Hawkins <br />explained that any settlement with Mr. Birch must include going <br />through the process and getting the subdivision processed in the <br />ordinary manner. This would include going through the Planning <br />and Zoning process. Mr. Hawkins explained that it appeared that <br />Mr. Birch is looking to "save face" by being able to say that he <br />did get something from the City. However, the City is obligated <br />to try to save tax payers dollars and if a settlement can be <br />reached without further litigation, this would be a win/win <br />situation. <br />Mr. Radio explained that if the City were to enter into some type <br />of settlement with Mr. Birch and all the right words were not put <br />into the contract and Mr. Birch does not get his four (4) lots, <br />he will surely sue for breach of contract. Mr. Radio agreed with <br />Mr. Hawkins and said that the City should not guarantee that Mr. <br />Birch will get four (4) lots. <br />Mr. Hawkins recommended that Mr. Radio tell Mr. Birch that the <br />City Council looked at his proposal and generally felt good about <br />it and suggest that he start the subdivision process. Mr. <br />Hawkins felt that a formal reply to Mr. Birch was not necessary. <br />Mr. Brixius suggested that Mr. Birch be made aware that the <br />wetlands delineation is a cost that he must assume. He will be <br />required to complete the wetlands delineation for any type of <br />improvement in the area. <br />Mr. Radio said he will tell Mr. Birch that the City Council met <br />and discussed his concept of four (4) buildable lots and decided <br />that the City will not oppose any subdivision that Mr. Birch is <br />PAGE 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.