My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/27/1995 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1995
>
03/27/1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2017 12:16:07 PM
Creation date
7/10/2017 2:25:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
03/27/1995
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The geographic implications of this flexibility is also limited. <br />The City only has 52.2 acres of commercial zoned land within the <br />designated shoreland areas (see Table E). This represents only 1.2 <br />percent of the City's total Shoreland Overlay District. The City <br />has 86.70 acres or 1.9 percent of the Shoreland Overlay District <br />zoned industrial. The industrial zoned land is not directly <br />abutting any lake surface. <br />CITY CHARTER <br />Lino Lakes is a charter city. The City Charter allows residents to <br />refuse assessments for infrastructure improvements until such time <br />as they made connection to the utility. This unique charter <br />provision limits the City in its future utility planning and places <br />the burden of costs for utility extension on the potential <br />developments. <br />The implications of reducing densities, as suggested by the State <br />shoreland regulations, would reduce the critical mass of a <br />developments falling within 1,000 feet of any protected lake or <br />wetland necessary to make development projects financially <br />feasible. Thus, the imposition of lower residential development <br />densities in the City's shoreland areas compounds a pre-existing <br />development obstacle. The fact that developers must bear both the <br />cost of infrastructure improvements and comply with reduced <br />development densities discounts the marketability of the City's <br />developable shoreland areas. Obviously, this lies contrary to the <br />City's development objectives of escalating the City's tax base and <br />promoting infill orderly development. <br />CONCLUSION <br />The City agrees with the purpose and intent of the Shoreland <br />Regulations and is willing to incorporate most of the State <br />Shoreland Regulations into its local ordinance to protect and <br />preserve its lake sources. However, the City is requesting <br />flexibility in select areas of the Shoreland Regulations to <br />accommodate sustained growth. <br />We believe that the aforementioned physical and regulating <br />constraints faced by the City are unique to Lino Lakes and warrant <br />consideration of flexibility. The geographic application of the <br />proposed flexibility will be limited to only 4.9 percent of the <br />City Shoreland Overlay District. Additionally, Lino Lakes' current <br />development regulations, the Local Water Management Plan and <br />proposed adoption of the new shoreland performance standards <br />reflect the City's commitment to the protection of the local lake <br />resources by alternative performance standards. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.