My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/23/1999 EDAC Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Economic Development Advisory Committee
>
Minutes
>
1999
>
11/23/1999 EDAC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2022 3:32:05 PM
Creation date
7/11/2017 4:03:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EDAC
EDAC Document Type
EDAC Minutes
Meeting Date
11/23/1999
EDAC Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the city. Mr. Gorowsky stated he believes the focus for C/I development has changed <br />since EDAC began. Mr. Chase said a group needs to act as a watchdog committee over <br />the comprehensive plan since housing development directs commercial development. Ms. <br />Carlson noted that Springsted, the city’s bond consultant, presented a report that showed <br />an imbalance and the city needs to concentrate on higher value housing. Ms. Sullivan <br />stated that it must be recognized that this report’s goals were not the same as the <br />comprehensive planning goals. Ms. Carlson said she would want a guide for the future <br />from Springsted before voting on a comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Wessel said that the goal was to have 15% C/I market value by 2010, which averages <br />out to approximately $7-8 million per year. Mr. B. Johnson pointed out that to date, the <br />commercial development was up to the developers, and the city needed to become more <br />proactive. Mr. Wessel stated that staff used criteria to evaluate projects. Mr. Jensen said a <br />strong comprehensive plan and zoning code was essential to quality development. <br /> <br />Ms. Carlson asked how staff helps small businesses that ask for assistance. Ms. Divine <br />explained that in the case of new business, staff reviews projects, makes <br />recommendations, and guides them through the approvals process, but does not offer <br />them assistance with planning their building. Mr. F. Johnson noted that if a prospect can’t <br />afford an architect, it can’t afford to build. <br /> <br />Action: Mr. Milbauer moved to direct staff to incorporate the discussed changes to the <br />five year plan into the draft and bring to the Dec. 2 EDAC meeting for further review. Mr. <br />F. Johnson seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />PLANNING AND FINANCE SUBCOMMITTEES <br /> <br />Mr. Gorowsky stated that there was unanimous support for these committees at the last <br />EDAC meeting. Mr. Chase said each committee will decide the direction it wants to take. <br />The regular EDAC meetings will serve as a clearinghouse for the subcommittees. Ms. <br />Sullivan noted that the city council was not aware of EDAC’s intent and if the council has <br />specific feelings toward public investment, EDAC should be aware of this. Friday reports <br />can keep the council advised on the direction of EDAC. <br /> <br />Members discussed meeting dates and concluded that Planning would meet on Nov. 30, <br />Dec. 21, and Jan. 11. Finance will meet on Dec. 14, Jan. 4 and Jan. 25. Mr. B. Johnson <br />requested that Jeff Smyser, city planner, attend the first planning meeting. <br /> <br />Action: Mr. Milbauer moved to approve the meeting dates. Mr. F. Johnson seconded the <br />motion. Motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Ms. Divine said she would make schedules and agendas and fax to members. <br /> <br />ONE YEAR ACTION PLAN <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.