Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br />was planned, the district wanted light industrial land. The council took action that if there <br />was a displacement of C/I land, land of equal value must replace it. Mr. Gorowsky <br />recalled that the school superintendent attended an EDAC meeting and it was agreed the <br />district would acquire land other than the light industrial. Mr. Juni questioned if it is too <br />late to make a recommendation if the school board is ready to make the decision. and why <br />the district hasn’t asked if a rezone was possible. Mr. Chase noted they can’t build <br />without a rezone. Mr. Powell stated the PSP site on Birch Street had poor soils, and <br />would cause additional traffic. Mr. Chase said the city needs to look at the economic <br />impact of taking the property off the tax rolls. Mr. Gorowsky moved that EDAC <br />encourage the city council to consider no net loss of commercial/industrial land in <br />accordance with the city council’s policy adopted in 1995. Mr. Juni seconded the motion. <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Mr. Bergeson noted that the school district was also courting the YMCA to build in <br />conjunction with the new school. The council made it clear that the city partnership with <br />the YMCA was contingent upon the Village site. <br /> <br />Mr. Powell discussed the Hodgson Road project as a backdrop for what is happening in <br />the Town Center. Anoka County has a design to reconstruct it from Lake Drive to County <br />Road J. It is currently posted at 50 mph, which restricts county’s design flexibility. The <br />city council has requested the speed be dropped to 45 mph, which will open up options <br />for the design. If the county cannot design a satisfactory road on Hodgson, it will <br />reevaluate the entire project that extends to the interchange. They have already said the <br />$13 million in funding will move to Coon Rapids, and the Lake Drive interchange would <br />lose funding. <br /> <br />RESIDENTIAL HOUSING LIMIT/TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT <br />Mr. Wessel reminded ECAC of their recommendations regarding housing in the Town <br />Center. Developers are expressing concerns about a cap on housing, especially with a 90- <br />unit project in the Village. Housing in the town center is critical to the economic <br />development initiative. Mr. Bergeson said the council had discussion of a dual track on <br />housing units, realizing whatever goes in the Town Center will have to be built all at <br />once. Nothing is formalized. Council will take into consideration EDAC’s <br />recommendation. The overall goal for 20 years has not changed. <br /> <br />Mr. Chase said he believes the Comprehensive Plan committee intended that the limit <br />was a long term average, and it would be unfair to other developers to close the door. But <br />the overall limit can be strived for over the duration of the 20 years. The market will <br />dictate the timing. Mr. Wessel said it is necessary that staff knows that it can actually <br />build what they are negotiating with the developers. Mr. Juni said he wants to hear <br />feedback from the council. EDAC’s position is set, but they don’t know what the <br />council’s position is. Mr. Bergeson said the recent actions can go to the council for <br />feedback. Ms. Divine reminded the committee that the Town Center housing <br />recommendations were a part of the 5-year plan and presented to the council. <br />