Laserfiche WebLink
Additionally, three (3) off-street parking areas do not meet the City's minimum setback <br />requirement of twenty (20) feet. These areas are located as follows: South of Apollo Drive <br />and west of the proposed roadway (5 foot setback); South of the proposed roadway near <br />35W (10 foot setback); And finally, located at the end of the proposed cul-de-sac (0 <br />setback). <br />Flexibility is also requested here through the PDO. Given the previously mentioned <br />development constraints of the site, some setback flexibility is warranted. However, as <br />shown on Exhibit E, with the shifting of the two buildings located west of the internal street <br />to the south, the parking area setbacks can be increased to 15 feet off of the Apollo Drive <br />right-of-way, 10 feet off of the I -35W right-of-way. Additionally, the parking area at the end <br />of the cul-de-sac can be shifted to the east to maintain a 5 foot setback from the right-of- <br />way. <br />Concern is raised in regard to the parking of vehicles in the driveways of the individual <br />units during the winter months, specifically in regard to potential damage to vehicles <br />parked to close to the paved surface from snow plowing of the internal roadway. Under <br />the recommended site plan (Exhibit E), there is a 30 foot separation from the garage to the <br />paved surface of the roadway. Although the proposed changes will increase the driveway <br />lengths of the townhomes from the internal street, we would recommend, as a condition <br />of approval a deed convent shall be established which states that the City shall not be held <br />liable for any damage caused to a vehicle parked within a driveway from snow plowing. <br />Structure Separation. Section 6, Subd. 7 (2)(D)(v) of the Zoning Ordinance stipulates no <br />structures may be closer than 20 feet to another building. The proposed building <br />placement conforms to this separation requirement. <br />Open Space. According to Section 6, Subd. 8.2.E.(iv)(c) of the Zoning Ordinance, at least <br />35% of the site must be devoted to green grass or open space. The site plan indicates <br />2.08 acres of the site will be devoted to green area, or 42%, therefore, the proposal meets <br />the minimum requirement. <br />In accordance with Section 6, Subd 20 of the Zoning Ordinance, a PDO is required to <br />provide active recreational open space. The applicant is proposing to construct a <br />volleyball court and horseshoe pit, therefore, the required recreational area has been <br />provided. <br />Structure Land Coverage. According to Section 6, Subd. 8.2.E.(iv.) (b) of the Lino Lakes <br />Zoning Ordinance, the area covered by any structures shall not exceed 35 percent of the <br />total land area. The applicant is proposing 31,997 square feet of building area or 15%, of <br />the total site, therefore, the proposal meets the City's minimum requirement. <br />7 <br />