My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-07-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
08-07-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 11:10:08 AM
Creation date
8/8/2017 12:09:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/07/2017
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update <br /> <br /> <br />Planning & Zoning Board Meeting <br />August 9, 2017 Page 1 <br />Potential Land Use Study Areas, August 2017 <br /> Updates since July 12, 2017 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting <br />Staff/Consultant Recommendations <br /> Area (Acres) Current Land Use Plan Utility <br />Staging <br /> <br />Area Location Description Gross Net 2030 Build Out Issue(s) <br />1-A Hodgson Rd (CSAH 49) <br />& County Rd J (Ash St.) <br />56.25 51.61 Mixed Use & <br />Medium Density <br />Same 1A • Reaffirm commitment to 2007 Master Plan <br />• Excerpts of Master Plan attached <br />• P&Z consensus: continue referring to 2007 Master <br />Plan <br /> <br />Recommendation: Continue references to 2007 <br />Master Plan in 2040 Update. <br /> <br />1-B Hodgson Rd (CSAH 49) <br />& Birch St (CSAH34) <br />1.84 1.84 Commercial Commercial 1A • Land use designation—possible change due to <br />access, size, surrounding land use. <br />• Potential mixed use classification to allow flexibility <br />for either office use or residential compatible with <br />surrounding townhome development <br />• P& Z consensus: continue commercial <br />classification, examine zoning classification for <br />compatibility with surrounding area <br />• EDAC comment: site seems to be better suited for <br />higher density residential based on access <br /> <br />Recommendation: Continue current Commercial <br />classification. Consider changes to plan or zoning <br />designations if suitable development plan submitted to <br />the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.