My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-07-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
08-07-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 11:10:08 AM
Creation date
8/8/2017 12:09:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/07/2017
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update <br /> <br />Planning & Zoning Board Meeting <br />August 7, 2017 Page 6 <br /> <br />Land Use Policy Discussion Items, August 2017 <br /> <br /># Description 2030 Plan Notes <br />LP-1 Mixed Use Development “The purpose of this category is to accommodate a <br />mix of residential, retail and office uses Residential <br />development may include higher density housing <br />options.” (Table 3-2, page 3-11) <br />• Category needs clarification. How must “mixing” occur? Within each <br />site or development project? This may be difficult for small parcels. <br />• Can this category be used to allow flexibility for commercial OR <br />residential uses? <br />• Should there be different approaches for different areas of the <br />community? <br /> <br />Recommendation: Land use Plan should give guidance on Mixed Use <br />category and include goals for each Mixed Use area including <br />residential/commercial split, similar to current plan (see pages 3-16 <br />through 3-18 and Table 3-4.) <br /> <br />LP-2 Industrial Land Use “The purpose of this category is to accommodate <br />manufacturing, processing, warehousing, and <br />research and development uses.” (Table 3-2, page 3- <br />11) <br />• Can a single industrial classification respond to city’s desire for <br />business park/corporate campus areas versus more traditional <br />industrial areas with outside storage and/or distribution uses? <br />• Should there be different classification(s) for high visibility areas or to <br />ensure compatibility with adjacent uses? <br /> <br />Recommendation: consider splitting industrial use into two <br />classifications, one for existing areas allowing a full range of industrial uses <br />and a new “Business Campus” classification for large, high-visibility sites. <br />Emphasize employment over warehousing; higher standards for design. <br />Planned uses may include some commercial to support the business and <br />employment base. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.