My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-07-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
08-07-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 11:10:08 AM
Creation date
8/8/2017 12:09:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/07/2017
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Water Storage Siting Study <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />WSB Project No. 2988-44 Page 11 <br />Table 7 – 1.5 MG Composite Water Tower Estimated 50-Year Life Cycle Cost <br />Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost <br />1.5 MG Composite Water Tower 1 EA $3,325,000 $3,325,000 <br />Associated Site Work 1 LS $300,000 $300,000 <br />Land Purchase for Water Tower <br />Site 1.5 ACRE $100,000 $150,000 <br />Sandblast and recoat interior and <br />exterior of steel bowl every 15 <br />years 3 EA $704,000 $2,112,000 <br />Subtotal $5,887,000 <br />Engineering, Bidding, and <br />Construction Services (5%) $294,350 <br />Total Estimated 50-Year Cost $6,181,350 <br /> <br />4.4 Comparison of Life Costs <br />The opinion of probable capital and operation and maintenance costs are summarized in Table 8. The <br />estimated costs are present day costs. A composite water tower has the lowest estimated capital cost <br />and the lowest estimated total cost although the 50-year operation and maintenance costs are higher <br />than the costs for a concrete ground storage reservoir and booster station. The elevated tower costs <br />assume that suitable soils are available on-site. The estimated electricity costs for the booster station <br />pumps for the ground storage reservoir option are not included since there would be an equal reduction in <br />electricity costs for the well pumps (the well pumps would be pumping to a lower elevation at the ground <br />storage reservoir). Based on this evaluation and the fact that the City is not considering a water <br />treatment plant at this time, we recommend the City construct a 1.5 MG composite water tower. <br /> <br />Table 8: Opinion of Probable Capital and O&M Costs for All Options <br />Option Estimated Capital <br />Cost Including <br />Engineering, Bidding, <br />and Construction <br />Services <br />Estimated 50 Year <br />Operation and <br />Maintenance Cost <br />Total Capital and <br />O&M Cost <br />Concrete Ground Storage <br />Reservoir and Booster <br />Station <br />$6,059,248 $902,000 $6,961,248 <br />Fluted Column Style Water <br />Tower <br />$4,301,250 $3,600,000 $7,901,250 <br />Composite Style Water <br />Tower <br />$4,069,350 $2,112,000 $6,181,350 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.