My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-08-2012 Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Charter
>
Minutes
>
2012 Minutes
>
11-08-2012 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2017 1:17:40 PM
Creation date
9/1/2017 1:01:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Minutes
Supplemental fields
Date
11/8/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Charter Commission <br />November 8, 2012 <br />Page 2 <br />proposed that this process be tried as an experiment for three Commission meetings. <br />Commissioners Gunderson and Sutherland spoke in favor of the proposal as did Chair Lyden. <br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />Commissioners discussed item 6B Charter Amendments and noted that the Commission had not <br />been able to acquire a legal opinion advice from the its attorney in sufficient time to make <br />Novernbee ballotbefore the ballot deadline expired. Commissioner Gunderson raised the <br />question about whether there was a sufficient balance remaining in the Commission's budget to <br />allow for attorney fees. <br />Council Member Rafferty commented that only one bill for $303.00 has been submitted for <br />payment leaving a balance of slightly under $1200.00 <br />Commissioners raised a question about which they would like to get a legal opinion: <br />What is the process for getting a proposed amendment on the ballot when the Commission and <br />City Council disagree? <br />Another question for which they would like a response is: what funding do other charter cities <br />receive? <br />Commissioners expressed a desire to have a discussion of the Charter amendment added to the <br />January 2013 agenda. <br />MOTION by Commissioner Storberg, seconded by Commissioner Gunderson, to have the entire <br />Commission and the entire Council meet together to discuss the provisions of Chapter 8. <br />AMENDMENT offered by Commissioner Timm that there be a tight agenda agreed to the Mayor <br />and the Commission Chair and that some procedural rules for discussion be defined. <br />Council Member Stoesz left at 8:04 <br />The question was called and the vote to vote on the main motion passed with Commissioners <br />Aldentaler, Trehus and Turcotte voting no. <br />The main motion passed with Commissioners Storberg, Lyden, Williams, Bartsch, Gunderson, <br />Timm and Penn voting in favor and Commissioners Trehus, Turcotte, Bretoi, Dahl, and <br />Aldentaler opposed. <br />Commissioners Bretoi and Sutherland left at 8:17. <br />MOTION by Commissioner Trehus, seconded by Commissioner Turcotte, that the officers of the <br />Commission work with the Commission's attorney to review the Commission's proposed <br />amendments and that the attorney be asked to provide an opinion in terms of their <br />constitutionality, and to respond to the opinions rendered by the City's attorney regarding the <br />legality of the proposed amendments <br />The motion passed with two Commissioners opposed. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />No new business was discussed. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.