Laserfiche WebLink
WS — Item #2 <br />WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />Work Session Item #2 <br />Date: August 3, 2009 <br />To: City Council <br />From: Julie Bartell <br />Re: Proposed Charter Amendment <br />Background <br />On July 13, 2009 the Lino Lakes Charter Commission submitted the attached charter <br />amendment and indicated that this amendment should be considered a proposal under <br />Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.12, Subd. 7, Amendment by ordinance. The proposed <br />amendment was distributed to the council at their work session that evening, thus <br />commencing the statute defined schedule for consideration of this type of amendment. <br />Staff has prepared and attached to this report a timeline (schedule) indicating deadlines <br />and possible dates for the following process: <br />➢ Publication of a public hearing notice on the amendment (must be published prior <br />to August 13). If the council authorizes a hearing this evening, a notice would <br />appear in the Quad Community Press on August 11. <br />➢ The date of the public hearing must be established no sooner than two weeks but <br />within one month of publication of the hearing notice on August 11. This means <br />the hearing must be held on or between the dates of August 25 through September <br />11. This does present an issue since there is no regular council meeting (other <br />than a work session on September 8) scheduled during this time period. <br />➢ Within one month of the public hearing, the council must vote on the proposed <br />charter amendment ordinance (regular council meetings in September are <br />scheduled for the 14th and 28th). Statute states that the ordinance is enacted if it <br />receives an affirmative vote of all members of the council. Section 3.05 of the <br />City Charter establishes certain procedures on adoption of ordinances including a <br />requirement for two readings at least 14 days apart. The city attorney has been <br />asked for an opinion as to whether this applies to this type of charter amendment <br />ordinance since the statute seems to imply that enact requires just one unanimous <br />vote of the council. <br />1 <br />