My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-06-2009 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter
>
Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Packets
>
2009 Packets
>
08-06-2009 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 5:25:46 PM
Creation date
9/8/2017 9:04:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Special
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
8/6/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
➢ If the ordinance is enacted, there is a 90 -day delay before the amendment <br />becomes effective during which a 60 -day period is allowed for submission of a <br />registered voter petition for referendum (thus commencing a new process for <br />ballot consideration). <br />Upon receipt of this proposed charter amendment on July 13, the council also requested <br />that staff gather information on the cost of implementing the additional services called for <br />by the amendment. In response, the cost for video technician services is $12 per hour <br />(with a 3 hour minimum). <br />Requested Council Direction <br />Staff is requesting that the council review the schedule for consideration of the proposed <br />charter amendment, direct staff to prepare and publish the appropriate hearing notice, and <br />schedule a special city council meeting for the purpose of conducting a public hearing. <br />Staff is also requesting direction on preparation of the amendment. At this point the <br />amendment is in the form of a letter from the charter commission and it should be <br />reformatted to the properly as a charter amendment ordinance. Upon receipt of the <br />proposed amendment, it was immediately forwarded to City Attorney Joe Langel with a <br />request that he review and verify its status as a proper amendment request. His attached <br />response indicates that the subject of the amendment is an appropriate consideration. He <br />has questioned, however, the wording of the amendment. An additional legal opinion <br />was received that indicates further questions about the language of the proposed <br />amendment. <br />Attachment(s) <br />1. Letter from Charter Commission proposing charter amendment <br />2. Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.12. <br />3. Timeline for consideration of 2009 charter amendment <br />4. Communication from City Attorney Joseph Langel <br />5. Communication from Attorney Michael Dougherty <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.