05-22-2008 Charter Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

A.G. Op. 624a-3 (June 28, 1999); A.G. Op. 1001-a (Sept. 15, 1950). Muhring v. School District No 31, 244 Minn. 432, 28 N.W.2d 655 (1947); Minneapolis Gas and Light Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 36 Minn. 159, 30 N.W. 450 (1886). Nordmarken v. City of Richfield, 641 N.W.2d 343 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002); Sinclair Oil Corp. v. City of St. Paul, 2002 WL 1902920 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002); Columbia Heights Relief Ass 'n v. City of Columbia Heights, 305 Minn. 399, 233 N.W.2d 760 (1975). Mangold Midwest Co. v. Vill. of Richfield, 274 Minn. 347, 143 N.W.2d 813 (1966); State v. Kuhlman, 729 N.W.2d 577 (Minn.,2006); State v. Burns, A05-2554 (Minn. Ct.App.,2007) (unpublished decision) B. Delegation of powers Absent specific statutory or charter authority, the council of a charter city may not delegate its powers and duties calling for the exercise of judgment and discretion to other persons or bodies. Specific language must exist in the charter authorizing any delegation of these powers. IV. Conflict between state laws and home rule charters Harmonizing general statutory language and charter provisions dealing with the same subject is often difficult. Cities can resolve potential conflicts between state laws and charter provisions through the following process: A. General rule The general rule is that when a charter provision is in conflict with the state statutes, the statutory provision prevails and the charter provision is ineffective to the extent it conflicts with the state policy. B. Identifying a conflict When state law is silent 011 an issue covered by charter and the issue is one that the Legislature has the power to delegate to a city, the assumption is that there is no conflict with state policy. On the other hand, when a charter provision and state law deal with the same issue, the possibility for conflict occurs. Rather than requesting an attorney general's opinion or having a court resolve the possible conflict, a city council can, by resolution, rely on the opinion of its attorney as to whether a conflict exists. In making this decision, the attorney should consider the following points: • Is there a court case or attorney general's opinion that deals with the same or similar provisions? If so, the city must follow the court ruling. Even though attorney general opinions are only advisory, the city should seriously consider the reasoning behind such an opinion. The LMC Handbook attempts to identify all court decisions and attorney general opinions that deal with charter and state law conflicts in order to assist charter city officials in determining what state laws apply to their city.