Laserfiche WebLink
Charter Commission <br />January 11, 2007 <br />Page 3 <br />DRAFT <br />'' 91 Commissioner Bor stated that it was not the position of City Staff to provide the <br />92 information to assess if an amendment was necessary. Chair Warren responded he was <br />93 speaking for Council and Staff. She believed they should work with the Commission, <br />94 even if the request for specific City staff was ineffective. A joint meeting might help <br />95 define what could and could not be done. <br />96 <br />97 Commissioner Trehus expressed concern they should allow access to City staff, and <br />98 should not direct the Commission to training. He believed it was hindering the process. <br />99 <br />100 Commissioner Bening asked for clarification. Commissioner Trehus answered that the <br />101 Commission requested information and was denied. The people holding the <br />102 neighborhood surveys knew the issues. <br />103 <br />104 Commissioner Duffy indicated the intent of the Commission was to see if there was a <br />105 viable alternative. She directed the Commission to a note from William Hawkins and <br />106 Associates dated April 12, 2005 and addressed to the City Administrator referring to <br />107 Minnesota Statute 410. <br />108 <br />109 Chair Warren noted the possibility that the Commission might not be inviting enough <br />110 people or the right people. She wanted to involve the people who would move it forward. <br />111 She recommended the item also be discussed at the next meeting. At the July meeting, <br />112 the Commission would draft an amendment and have it ready for the vote. <br />113 <br />114 Commissioner Bor questioned if the letter gave any assurance that something could be in <br />115 place. <br />116 <br />117 Commissioner Storberg inquired if any progress had been made since the last meeting. <br />118 She believed it should be initiated to benefit the roads and recommended tabling the issue <br />119 to allow Council and Staff to approach the Commission. <br />120 <br />121 Commissioner Vacha agreed that the issue should be tabled. Commissioner Carlson <br />122 concurred, stating that Council should be motivating the Commission to act. <br />123 <br />124 Chair Warren stated that Council could make an amendment that might not serve the <br />125 community. Commissioner Trehus responded he did not believe that Council was trying <br />126 to work with the Commission. If the Commission did not go forth with the issue, the <br />127 amendment concern did not automatically rest. He noted the City Administrator <br />128 indicated that Council would decide. He was willing to go to a training session. <br />129 <br />130 Commissioner Storberg reminded the Commission of the stadium example. <br />131 <br />132 MOTION by Commissioner Storberg, seconded by Commissioner Rosemary Williams, <br />133 to table any further discussion on road construction to be opened at the time of the <br />134 Commission's choice. Motion carried unanimously. <br />135 <br />