My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-10-2013 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2013 Packets
>
10-10-2013 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 11:26:11 AM
Creation date
9/15/2017 11:02:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
10/10/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Charter Commission <br />July 25, 2013 <br />Page 2 <br />45 Commissioner Storberg referenced a Charter proposed in 2007 which did not require votes to <br />46 complete roadwork and questioned why that was not included in the documentation. <br />47 <br />48 Chair Lyden stated that he received a letter from the Mayor and he composed a response, which <br />49 he passed out to the Commission. He noted that these letters are not on the agenda and is simply <br />50 for the Commission to review. <br />51 <br />52 APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES <br />53 Commissioner Bretoi stated that in reference to the Members present, he should be listed as <br />54 excused. <br />55 <br />56 Commissioner Penn referenced line 20, it should state, "Chair Dahl Lyden..." <br />57 <br />58 Commissioner Trehus referenced the approval of meeting minutes from the previous November <br />59 meeting and noted that the corrections to the minutes should be listed. <br />60 <br />61 Commissioner Gunderson stated that her notes from the February meeting included an action <br />62 item regarding research for professional secretary services and presenting that to the Council. <br />63 She stated that she spoke with Commissioner Penn, who did not remember a motion being made, <br />64 but believed that there may have been an action item at that meeting. She noted that she did <br />65 attend the Council meeting in March following the February meeting. <br />66 <br />67 Commissioner Trehus believed that Commissioner Gunderson moved forward on that item <br />68 following consensus rather than a formal motion. He noted that other Commissioners also <br />69 proceeded to collect additional information. <br />70 <br />71 Commissioner Gunderson asked to add the following statement "Upon completion of research <br />72 Commissioner Gunderson agreed to present a budget request at a future Worksession" <br />73 <br />74 Commissioner Turcotte suggested that someone review the audio recording of the meeting. <br />75 <br />76 Commissioner Gunderson volunteered to meet with Commissioner Dahl to review the tape. <br />77 <br />78 MOTION by Commissioner Gunderson, seconded by Commissioner Turcotte, approving the <br />79 meeting minutes of February 21, 2013. <br />80 <br />81 Motion passed unanimously. (Commissioners Penn and Timm abstained) <br />82 <br />83 OLD BUSINESS <br />84 <br />85 A. Last year, the City Council proposed two housekeeping amendments seeking to <br />86 bring dates and timing into compliance with the new State Statutes, Section 4.02. <br />87 Filing for Office and Section 8.04, Subdivision 2, Council suggested adoption of this <br />88 Charter amendment by ordinance. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.