My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-26-2012 Council Minutes (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2012
>
11-26-2012 Council Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2014 11:54:54 AM
Creation date
3/7/2013 10:42:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/26/2012
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION November 26,2012 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 46 Item 3C—2013 City Fee Schedule Ordinance—Charges that were deemed to be <br /> 47 obsolete by staff were questioned and an additional suggestion offered by a council <br /> 48 member to make the city code book, city charter and environmental handbook available <br /> 49 under the per page cost. <br /> 50 <br /> 51 Mayor Reinert touched on the subject of excessive information requests. Sometimes the <br /> 52 impact of such requests is costly (legal or consultant response). He'd like a discussion <br /> 53 clarifying how those type of services are handled and costs involved. The goal isn't to <br /> 54 refuse information but to offer it in the most efficient form. <br /> 55 <br /> 56 Council Member Stoesz noted the charges for vehicle lock out services provided by the <br /> 57 Police Department. He is interested in hearing from the Police Chief the type and <br /> 58 frequency of those services and the cost to the city. <br /> 59 <br /> 60 Not on Printed Agenda - Council Member Rafferty noted in the area of Lake Drive and <br /> 61 Main Street there is road construction. Some of the roadway, particularly south on Lake <br /> 62 Drive, appears to be poorly done (not smooth). Is that a finished roadway? Community <br /> 63 Development Director Grochala explained staff did notice the finish and has spoken to <br /> 64 Anoka County about it. It appears they are satisfied with product and that portion of the <br /> 65 project was done at their cost. City Engineer Wedel added that the roadway was actually <br /> 66 done as a crack and seat project in that area, meaning that the concrete underlayment is <br /> 67 actually cracked and asphalt laid over it. The end project isn't always as smooth as with <br /> 68 other techniques. Mr. Wedel suggested that although a less smooth service may appear to <br /> 69 be poor work, it doesn't reflect quality at all but is really just a ridability issue. Removing <br /> 70 all the concrete to avoid the crack and seat would be very costly. <br /> 71 <br /> 72 Council Member Roeser asked if staff has made progress on the council's request to get <br /> 73 information added to the city website on the progress of the two signal projects. Mr. <br /> 74 Wedel responded that staff is working on that. <br /> 75 <br /> 76 Council Member Roeser noted that the council will soon be considering appointments to <br /> 77 advisory boards and commissions. He wonders if current conditions in the city call for <br /> 78 the number of advisory boards that exist. Mayor Reinert explained that he has been <br /> 79 involved with the city during much busier times and has seen the valuable contribution <br /> 80 those boards make. <br /> 81 <br /> 82 The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m. <br /> 83 <br /> 84 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on <br /> 85 December 10, 2012. <br /> 86 <br /> 87 <br /> ss <br /> 8'11V3 <br /> 90 u is e Bartell, City lerk Jef ' - ert, Mayor <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.