My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07-13-2006 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2006 Packets
>
07-13-2006 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 6:20:45 PM
Creation date
9/15/2017 11:42:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
7/13/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Charter Commission <br />April 13, 2006 <br />Page 10 <br />DRAFT <br />398 issue by suggesting the process would be a fund that would call things into action but does not <br />399 address avoiding the process. <br />400 <br />401 Commissioner Trehus stated this is the same question as on the 1996 citizen survey but it does <br />402 not say anything about whether they would still vote on the road, it only addresses establishing a <br />403 fund. <br />404 <br />405 Commissioner Bening stated option F gets into the realm of too much detail in the Charter. He <br />406 stated standards are needed in the City for when a street is going to be reconstructed. One of <br />407 those standards is curb and gutter. The project has to be approved by a majority of the residents <br />408 affected by the project and then the question is whether the City voters want to fund it. As long <br />409 as more than 50% of the people affected understand the ramifications, it should go forward but it <br />410 must meet standards. <br />411 <br />412 Commissioner Carlson stated he has concern with options E and F but likes the idea of a process. <br />413 With regard to option E, he noted that expansion of the trail system received a clear majority of <br />414 support from the residents surveyed but they do not want to spend much. He commented that <br />415 trails are part of a system and it is important to the community to have those connections. <br />416 <br />417 Commissioner Montain stated his agreement with options A, B, C, D, and G and suggested <br />418 standard clarification language be offered to the Council regarding procedure. <br />419 <br />420 MOTION by Commissioner Montain, seconded by Commissioner Bening, to strongly urge the <br />`-- 421 Council to look at options A, B, C, D, and G to help clarify the language used, which will help <br />422 projects to get approved. <br />423 <br />424 Commissioner Bor thanked Commissioner Trehus for his effort and stated it is a Council and <br />425 staff issue to address process, as mentioned by Commissioner Zastrow. She stated if you look at <br />426 the survey of the 400, there is room for improvement, as the Commission knows. However, <br />427 residents do not want to pay for it. She stated that new developments will take advantage of that <br />428 but it is a separate process from the Charter. Commissioner Bor stated she is addressing option E <br />429 related to nonassessable projects, which she believes should be a separate process. She <br />430 suggested that Commissioner Trehus, as a citizen, should present it to the Council to be worked <br />431 out. <br />432 <br />433 Commissioner Trehus stated if you want to see West Shadow or a similar project get <br />434 neighborhood approval, then option F is needed and it would be a mistake to not include it. He <br />435 suggested that with a complex project, like West Shadow, the City has to sit down and talk to the <br />436 residents, or they will not support the project. He stated the Charter is a good thing but he thinks <br />437 it could be better. He suggested forwarding this memorandum and the Commission's comments <br />438 to the Council and to request comments from the Council. Commissioner Trehus stated he will <br />439 vote against the motion because it excludes options E and F. <br />440 <br />10 <br />-11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.