01-09-2017 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION December 5, 2016 DRAFT 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 MINUTES 2 3 DATE : December 5, 2016 4 TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 5 TIME ENDED : 9:30 p.m. 6 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Kusterman, 7 Maher, Manthey and Mayor Reinert 8 MEMBERS ABSENT : None 9 10 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Public Safety Director John 11 Swenson; Community Development Director Michael Grochala; Finance Director Sarah 12 Cotton; Public Services Director Rick DeGardner; City Planner Katie Larsen; City 13 Engineer Diane Hankee; City Clerk Julie Bartell. 14 15 1. LED Retrofit Proposal for Civic Complex - Public Services Director 16 DeGardner introduced Jeff Rutz of Meridian Energy Products who reviewed the lighting 17 replacement proposal (that was distributed) noting that it doesn’t include the council 18 chambers. There are savings in kilowatt hours as well as light costs and revenue from a 19 rebate. Mr. Rutz noted the payback on the investment is about two and a half years and 20 the lighting life is about five years. Mayor Reinert asked if a street lighting retrofit is 21 something the city should consider also and Mr. Rutz said that isn’t included at this time 22 but he suspects it would be a good idea since LED technology has improved immensely. 23 Director DeGardner commented about lighting values as well as technology that allows 24 the change in some lights without new fittings. The council further discussed the 25 frequency of replacement requirements; Director DeGardner added that with less frequent 26 replacement, there would be savings in labor costs. Mr. DeGardner added that the 27 Finance Director has verified that that there is funding available in the current budget for 28 building maintenance/facilities. 29 30 The council concurred to move forward with the project. 31 2. Rush Line Corridor Presentation by Mike Rogers, Transit Project Manager 32 for the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority – City Planner Larsen Mike 33 Rogers of Ramsey County for a presentation on the proposed Rush Line Corridor project. 34 35 Mr. Rogers reviewed a presentation including: 36 - the area (corridor) that was studied; 37 - Public outreach involved and how that will be used for development of a best option: 38 - Evaluation criteria by project goal; 39 - Community Engagement (over 150 events and contact) and what was learned from that 40 process; 41 - Remaining alternatives for further assessment (heavy freight rail no longer an option, 42 need access to Maplewood Mall; possible alignment with Highway 61); 43 - Review of Goals by Remaining Transit Vehicles (looked at light rail, dedicated bus 44