Laserfiche WebLink
Anoka County Multi-Jurisdictional <br />All Hazards Mitigation Plan <br /> 24 <br /> <br /> Anoka County <br /> City of Andover <br /> City of Anoka <br /> City of Bethel <br /> City of Blaine <br /> City of Nowthen <br /> City of Centerville <br /> City of Circle Pines <br /> City of Columbia Heights <br /> City of Columbus <br /> City of Coon Rapids <br /> City of East Bethel <br /> City of Fridley <br /> City of Ham Lake <br /> City of Hilltop <br /> City of Lexington <br /> City of Lino Lakes <br /> Town of Linwood <br /> City of Oak Grove <br /> City of Ramsey <br /> City of St. Francis <br /> City of Spring Lake Park <br /> <br />To satisfy multi-jurisdictional participation requirements, each of the local jurisdictions was <br />required to perform the following tasks: <br /> <br /> Designate appropriate officials to serve on the Mitigation Planning Committee; <br /> Participate in all mitigation planning meetings and workshops; <br /> Provide best available data for the risk assessment portion of the Plan; <br /> Complete the Capability Assessment Survey and provide copies of any mitigation <br />or hazard-related documents for review and incorporation into the Plan; <br /> Support the development of a countywide mitigation strategy, including the <br />design and adoption of general goal statements for all jurisdictions to pursue; <br /> Develop a Mitigation Action Plan with specific mitigation actions for its <br />jurisdiction; <br /> Review and provide timely comments on all draft components of the Plan; <br /> Adopt the Anoka County Multi-Jurisdictional, All Hazards Mitigation Plan, <br />including its specific local Mitigation Action Plan. <br /> <br />Through the completion of these tasks, each municipality will have fully participated with Anoka <br />County in the development of this Plan. <br /> <br /> <br />2.8 Review and Incorporation of Existing Plans <br /> <br />An important aspect of the planning process involved the <br />review of existing federal, state, and local plans, studies, <br />reports, and technical information, as well as the <br />ordinances, regulations, and resolutions of each <br />Multi-hazard Requirement §201.6(a)(3): <br />Multi-jurisdictional plans (e.g., watershed <br />plans) may be accepted, as appropriate, <br />as long as each jurisdiction has <br />participated in the process … Statewide <br />plans will not be accepted as multi- <br />jurisdictional plans. <br />FMA Requirement §78.5(a): Description <br />of the planning process and public <br />involvement. Public involvement may <br />include workshops, public meetings, or <br />public hearings. <br />A. Does the plan describe how each <br />jurisdiction participated in the plan’s <br />development <br />E. Does the planning process <br />describe the review and <br />incorporation, if appropriate, of <br />existing plans, studies, reports, and <br />technical information?