Laserfiche WebLink
Anoka County Multi-Jurisdictional <br />All Hazards Mitigation Plan <br />249 <br /> <br /> <br />5.2.6 Mitigation Actions Prioritization <br />The cohesive collection of actions listed in each jurisdiction’s MAP also can serve as an easily <br />understood menu of mitigation policies and projects for local decision-makers who want to <br />quickly review their jurisdiction’s respective element of the countywide Plan. In preparing the <br />individual Mitigation Actions Plans, each jurisdiction considered their overall hazard risk and <br />capability to mitigate identified hazards as recorded through the risk and capability assessment <br />process and to meet the countywide mitigation goals and the unique needs of their community. <br /> <br />Prioritizing mitigation actions for each jurisdiction was based on the “STAPLEE” process. <br />“STAPLEE” uses multiple factors under the categories of Social, Technical, Administration, <br />Legal, Economic and Environment. <br /> <br />For each goal that is new or continued, the respective jurisdiction reviewed the “STAPLEE” <br />rating and adjusted for any changes that have occurred in the community since the previous <br />plan was reviewed. <br /> <br /> SOCIAL <br /> Community Acceptance – L=1 <br /> 1 – Potential objection from public and/or very expensive. <br /> 2 – Unknown if objectionable, or costs may be significant. <br /> 3 – Not objectionable and low/no costs. <br /> Effect On Population – L=3 Per FEMA criteria, this is based on potential <br />adverse effect on a segment of the community population. <br /> 3 – Minimal or no adverse impact on any population segment. <br /> 2 – Moderate adverse impact on some population segment. <br /> 1 – Serious adverse impact on some population segment. <br /> <br /> TECHNICAL <br /> Technical Feasibility – L=1 <br /> 1 – Technology not currently existing. <br /> 2 – Emerging or untested technology or unknown. <br /> 3 – Technology readily available. <br /> Long-Term Solution – L=1 <br /> 1 – No, is not effective in helping reduce losses in the long term. <br /> 2 – Potentially or unknown. <br /> 3 – Yes, is effective in helping reduce losses in the long term. <br /> Secondary Impacts – L=3 <br /> 3 – No, unlikely to create secondary problems. <br /> 2 – Potentially or unknown. <br /> 1 – Yes, likely to create secondary problems. <br /> <br /> ADMINISTRATIVE <br /> Staffing – L=3 <br /> 3 – Do not have to hire. <br /> 2 – Potentially need to hire a temporary employee(s) or unknown. <br /> 1 – Need to hire a permanent employee(s). <br /> Funding Potential – L=1