My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06-12-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
06-12-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2018 10:21:08 AM
Creation date
9/18/2017 3:55:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/12/2017
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
738
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Anoka County Multi-Jurisdictional <br />All Hazards Mitigation Plan <br /> 250 <br /> <br /> 1 – No obvious source of funding available and action has significant <br />cost impact. <br /> 2 – Limited or unknown funding available. <br /> 3 – Little or no funding required or funding can be readily obtained. <br /> Maintenance/Operations L=3 <br /> 3 – Action requires limited or no ongoing maintenance. Jurisdiction <br />has demonstrated ability to perform this action. <br /> 2 – Unknown or action has the potential for moderate ongoing <br />maintenance. <br /> 1 – The action is likely to require high level of ongoing maintenance. <br /> <br /> POLITICAL <br /> Political Support – L=1 <br /> 1 – Local Elected Official likely to be contentious <br /> 2 – Local Elected Official may be controversial <br /> 3 – Local Elected Official likely to be supportive <br /> Local Champion – L=1 <br /> 1 – Unlikely there is a Local Elected Official to support <br /> 2 – Uncertain if there is a Local Elected Official to champion <br /> 3 – A Local Elected Official is likely to support and champion <br /> Public Support – L=1 <br /> 1 – Public Political support is unlikely <br /> 2 – Public Political support is uncertain <br /> 3 – Public Political support is likely <br /> <br /> LEGAL <br /> State Authority Exists – L=1 <br /> 1 – No legal state authority exists <br /> 2 – Legal state authority is unclear, uncertain or adoption is in <br />progress <br /> 3 – Legal state authority exists <br /> Local Authority Exists – L=1 <br /> 1 – No legal authority exists <br /> 2 – Legal authority is unclear, uncertain or adoption is in progress <br /> 3 – Legal authority exists <br /> Potential Legal Challenge L=3 <br /> 3 – Low (likelihood of legal challenge by stakeholders.) <br /> 2 – Moderate (likelihood of legal challenge by stakeholders.) <br /> 1 – High (likelihood of legal challenge by stakeholders.) <br /> <br /> ECONOMIC (Multiple actions that are contingent upon each other will receive the <br />same ranking.) <br /> Action Benefit L=1 <br /> 1 – Low (benefit to the jurisdiction from the action.) <br /> 2 – Moderate (benefit to the jurisdiction from the action.) <br /> 3 – High (benefit to the jurisdiction from the action.) <br /> Action Cost L=3 <br /> 3 – Low cost to implement action. <br /> 2 – Moderate cost to implement action.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.