06-12-2017 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Anoka County Multi-Jurisdictional All Hazards Mitigation Plan 251  1 – High cost to implement action.  Economic Goal Contribution L=1  1 – Low contribution to other community economic goals.  2 – Moderate contribution to other community economic goals.  3 – High contribution to other community economic goals  Outside Funding Required L=3  3 – Unlikely for action to be delayed pending outside sources of funding.  2 – Possible for action to be delayed pending outside sources of funding.  1 – Likely for action to be delayed pending outside sources of funding.  ENVIRONMENTAL  Land/Water Effect L=3  3 – Low likelihood of potential negative consequences to land and water resources.  2 – Moderate likelihood of potential negative consequences to land and water resources.  1 – High likelihood of potential negative consequences to land and water resources.  Endangered Species Effect L = 3  3 – Low likelihood of potential negative consequences to endangered species.  2 – Moderate likelihood of potential negative consequences to endangered species.  1 – High likelihood of potential negative consequences to endangered species.  Hazmat Waste Site Effective L=3  3 – Low likelihood of potential affect on hazardous materials and waste sites.  2 – Moderate likelihood of potential affect on hazardous materials and waste sites.  1 – High likelihood of potential affect on hazardous materials and waste sites.  Environmental Effect L=3  3 – Yes, project is consistent with jurisdiction environmental goals.  2 – Possibly, project is consistent with jurisdiction environmental goals.  1 – No, project is not consistent with jurisdiction environmental goals.  Federal Law Compliant L=3  3 – Yes.  2 – Uncertain.  1 – No.