Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool 124 <br /> <br />d. The plan must include the title of the individual or name of the <br />department/ agency responsible for leading each of these efforts. <br />Met: <br />Assigned responsibility to Anoka <br />County Emergency Management <br />Director and staff, pages 275 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ELEMENT B. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />B1. Does the Plan include a description of the type, location, and extent of all natural hazards that <br />can affect each jurisdiction? 44 CFR 201.6(c)(2)(i) and 44 CFR 201.6(c)(2)(iii) <br />REQUIREMENT LOCATION <br />a. The plan must include a description of the natural hazards <br />that can affect the jurisdiction(s) in the planning area. <br />Met: <br />Section 4.3– the natural hazards are <br />described. Why are hazards being <br />described that were not selected? <br />b. The plan must provide the rationale for the omission of any <br />natural hazards that are commonly recognized to affect the <br />jurisdiction(s) in the planning area. <br />Met: <br />Section 4.3 – Page 69 has a good <br />summary. <br />c. The description, or profile, must include information on location, <br />extent, previous occurrences, and future probability for each <br />hazard. Previous occurrences and future probability are addressed <br />in sub‐element B2. <br />met: <br />Future probability is listed on page 113-115 of the <br />main plan. For our plan we used Very Likely, <br />Likely, or Possible for the chance an event <br />occurring in a particular Jurisdiction during any <br />single year. <br /> <br /> <br />d. For participating jurisdictions in a multi-jurisdictional plan, the <br />plan must describe any hazards that are unique and/or v aried <br />from those affecting the overall planning area. <br />Met: <br />In our plan for section 4.4.3- Page 115. The <br />differences were identified in the risk between the <br />jurisdictions. We did an analysis of four Hazards <br />to represent the possible affects and loss that <br />they could have on any of the Jurisdictions. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />B2. Does the Plan include information on previous occurrences of hazard events and on the <br />probability of future hazard events for each jurisdiction? 44 CFR 201.6(c)(2)(i) <br />REQUIREMENT LOCATION <br />a. The plan mu st include the history of previous hazard events for <br />each of the identified hazards. <br />Met: <br />Previous History of Events - are located section <br />4.3 with each of the natural and manmade <br />hazards that were identified as risks in Anoka <br />County (Main Plan pages 90 - 109) <br />To help identify hazard trends we used the Anoka <br />County Fire calls from 2006 to 2011 to review <br />trends <br />(Annex pages 3 - 9) <br />Meth lab seizures are summarized in (Annex <br />pages 11 - 12) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />b. The plan must include the probability of future events for <br />each identified hazard. <br />Met: <br />Probability of future events : This is included in <br />our Hazard Vulnerability section 4.4 (Pages 111- <br />121) <br /> <br />c. Plan updates must include hazard events that have occurred since <br />the last plan was developed. <br />Met: <br />Additional history of events is included in 4.4.4 <br />(Main plan pages 111 - 121 <br />ratings for the hazards and impact in each <br />jurisdiction are slightly different due to the makeup <br />of each jurisdiction. (Main Plan page 115 and