Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool 123 <br /> <br />A3. Does the Plan document how the public was involved in the planning process during the <br />drafting stage? <br />44 CFR 201.6(b)(1) and 201.6(c)(1) <br />REQUIREMENT LOCATION <br />a. The plan must document how the public was given the <br />opportunity to be involved in the planning process and how their <br />feedback was incorporated into the plan. Examples include, but are <br />not limited to, sign‐in sheets from open meetings, interactive <br />websites with drafts for public review and comment, <br />questionnaires or surveys, or booths at popular community events. <br />Met: <br />Section 2.5.1 – is a good overview. <br />Public notices and meeting attendance <br />sheets are included in pages 279 – 284 <br />(Main Plan) <br /> <br />Community Survey information and results <br />covered in pages 175 – 180 (Main Plan) and <br />results included in Appendix C (Annex) <br /> <br />b. The opportunity for participation must occur during the plan <br />development, which is prior to the comment period on the final <br />plan and prior to the plan approval / adoption. <br />Met: <br />Section 2.5.2, has been updated to meet <br />standards <br /> <br /> <br />A4. Does the Plan document the review and incorporation of existing plans, studies, reports, and <br />technical information? 44 CFR 201.6(b)(3) <br />REQUIREMENT LOCATION <br />a. The plan must document what existing plans, studies, reports, <br />and technical information were reviewed. Examples of the types <br />of existing sources reviewed include, but are not limited to, the <br />state hazard mitigation plan, local comprehensive plans, hazard <br />specific reports, and flood insurance studies. <br />Met: <br />Section 2.8 – this section meets the <br />requirement. <br />b. The plan must document how relevant information was <br />incorporated into the mitigation plan. <br />Met: <br />Section 2.8: Review and Incorporation of Existing <br />Plans <br />Reviewed and updated on page 26. <br /> <br />A5. Is there discussion on how the community(ies) will continue public participation in the plan <br />maintenance process? 44 CFR 201.6(c)(4)(iii) <br />REQUIREMENT LOCATION <br />a. The plan must describe how the jurisdiction(s) will continue to <br />seek public participation after the plan has been approved and <br />during the plan’s implementation, monitoring and evaluation. <br /> <br />Met: <br />Section 5.3.4 – The varied methods <br />stated in this section meets the <br />requirement. <br /> <br />A6. Is there a description of the method and schedule for keeping the plan current (monitoring, <br />evaluating and updating the mitigation plan within a 5‐year cycle)? 44 CFR 201.6I(4)(i) <br />REQUIREMENT LOCATION <br />a. The plan must identify how, when, and by whom the plan will be <br />monitored. <br /> <br /> <br />Met: <br /> <br />Steering committee members and <br />contact information on pages 14-16 <br />b. The plan must identify how, when, and by whom the plan will <br />be evaluated. <br /> <br /> <br />Met: <br />5.3. Mitigation Implementation and Plan <br />Maintenance <br />(plan will be monitored and reviewed, <br />pages 273 – 276) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />c. The plan must identify how, when, and by whom the plan will <br />be updated. <br /> <br />Met: <br />Sections 5.3.3 Monitoring, Evaluation, <br />and Enhancement (Page 274-275)