06-12-2017 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool 127 C4. Does the Plan identify and analyze a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects for each jurisdiction being considered to reduce the effects of hazards, with emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure? 44 CFR 201.6©(3)(ii) and 44 CFR 201.6©(3)(iv) REQUIREMENT LOCATION a. The plan must include a mitigation strategy that 1) analyzes actions and/or projects that the jurisdiction considered to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment, and 2) identifies the actions and/or projects that the jurisdiction intends to implement. Met: The list of the Mitigation Actions listed by priority is in section 5.2.5 (Page 182 - 248 of the main plan) b. Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the community’s risk and vulnerabilities, as well as community priorities. Met: The list of the Mitigation Actions listed by priority is in section 5.2.7 (Page 261 - 272 of the main plan) c. The action plan must reduce risk to existing buildings and infrastructure as well as limit any risk to new development and redevelopment. With emphasis on new and existing building and infrastructure means that the action plan includes a consideration of actions that address the built environment. Met: With goal 3.1 and specifically 3.1.4 Anoka County GIS provides the information and coordination with the Jurisdictions in Anoka County. C5. Does the Plan contain an action plan that describes how the actions identified will be prioritized (including cost benefit review), implemented, and administered by each jurisdiction? 44 CFR 201.6©(3)(iii) and 44 CFR ©(3)(iv) REQUIREMENT LOCATION a. The plan must describe the criteria used for prioritizing implementation of the actions. MET: STAPLEE was used to evaluate mitigation actions and prioritize mitigation actions within each Jurisdiction. (STAPLEE Process and rating system is listed on pages 249 – 259) The final priority list for Mitigation actions by each Jurisdiction are listed in the main plan on pages 261-272 b. The plan must demonstrate when prioritizing hazard mitigation actions that the local jurisdictions considered the benefits that would result from the hazard mitigation actions versus the cost of those actions. The requirement is met as long as the economic considerations are summarized in the plan as part of the community’s analysis. A complete benefic‐cost analysis is not required. Qualitative benefits (for example, quality of life, natural and beneficial values, or other “benefits”) can also be included in how actions will be prioritized. Met: Pages 198 – 232: The estimated cost and the estimated benefit are listed in two separate columns for each mitigation actions. c. The plan must identify the position, office, department, or agency responsible for implementing and administering the action (for each jurisdiction), and identify potential funding sources and expected timeframes for completion. Met: Pages 198 – 232: A column listing responsibility meets this requirement.