06-12-2017 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool 128 C6. Does the Plan describe a process by which local governments will integrate the requirements of the mitigation plan into other planning mechanisms, such as comprehensive or capital improvement plans, when appropriate? 44 CFR 201.6(c)(4)(ii) REQUIREMENT LOCATION a. The plan must describe the community’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. Met: 5.2.7( Mitigation Actions Implementation) Section 5.3.1 (Implementation) Pg 261-273 b. The plan must identify the local planning mechanisms where hazard mitigation information and/or actions may be incorporated. Met: Section 5.2.7 – Mitigation Actions Implementation Updated tables to reflect mitigation actions of each jurisdiction. Page 261 - 272 c. A multi‐jurisdictional plan must describe each participating jurisdiction’s individual process for integrating hazard mitigation actions applicable to their community into other planning mechanisms. Met: 5.3.1: Implementation- shows each Jurisdiction is responsible for implementing their goals into their specific plans. Page 273 d. The updated plan must explain how the jurisdiction(s) incorporated the mitigation plan, when appropriate, into other planning mechanisms as a demonstration of progress in local hazard mitigation efforts Met: Added section pointing readers to completed mitigation goals (section 5.2.7) Preview Mitigation measures also listed on page 169 e. The updated plan must continue to describe how the mitigation strategy, including the goals and hazard mitigation actions will be incorporated into other planning mechanisms. Met: Updated tables (Mitigation Actions Prioritization) reflect mitigation actions of each jurisdiction. Page 261 - 272 Note: ELEMENT D. PLAN REVIEW, EVALUATION, AND IMPLMENTATION D1. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in development? 44 CFR 201.6(d)(3) REQUIREMENT LOCATION a. The plan must describe changes in development that have occurred in hazard prone areas and increased or decreased the vulnerability of each jurisdiction since the last plan was approved. If no changes in development impacted the jurisdiction’s overall vulnerability, plan updates may validate the information in the previously approved plan. Met: Section 4.4.7 describes land use development meets part of the requirement. Each jurisdiction are included in their jurisdiction Descriptions Section 3.1, D2. Was the plan revised to reflect progress in local mitigation efforts? 44 CFR 201.6(d)(3) REQUIREMENT LOCATION a. The plan must describe the status of hazard mitigation actions in the previous plan by identifying those that have been completed or not completed. For actions that have not been completed, the plan must either describe whether the action is no longer relevant or be included as part of the updated action plan. Met: Section 5.1.6 does a nice job of listing completed mitigation actions. D3. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in priorities? 44 CFR 201.6(d)(3) REQUIREMENT LOCATION a. The plan must describe if and how any priorities changed since the plan was previously approved. If no changes in priorities are necessary, plan updates may validate the information in the previously approved plan. Met: Goals are outlined as new, ongoing, completed or canceled in section5.2.5(Process listed on page 183) ELEMENT E. PLAN ADOPTION