Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION August 15,2011 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> 2 MINUTES <br /> 3 <br /> 4 DATE : August 15, 2011 <br /> 5 TIME STARTED : 5:35 p.m. <br /> 6 TIME ENDED : 7:40 p.m. <br /> 7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Gallup, Rafferty,Roeser <br /> 8 and Mayor Reinert <br /> 9 MEMBERS ABSENT : Council Member O'Donnell <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Public Services Director Rick <br /> 12 DeGardner; Community Development Director Mike Grochala; Director of <br /> 13 Administration Dan Tesch; Public Safety Director John Swenson; Director of Finance Al <br /> 14 Rolek; City Clerk Julie Bartell <br /> 15 <br /> 16 2012 Budget—Administrator Karlson noted that the council previously reviewed the <br /> 17 proposed budget and staff is responding with information on possibilities to fill the <br /> 18 budget gap between proposed revenue and expenditures in the amount of$281,000 <br /> 19 (written information distributed). He also has health insurance figures that will be <br /> 20 presented for discussion. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Finance Director Rolek reviewed the list of items that could offset the gap including <br /> 23 results of the organizational review, a lesser than expected increase in health insurance <br /> �-' 24 costs, and change in janitorial services. The lease revenue for the ECFE portion of the <br /> 25 city facility is being deducted (one half year) since there isn't certainty at this point that <br /> 26 the lease will continue after mid-year. That leaves a gap of about $76,000. Mr. Rolek <br /> 27 then reviewed items presented as possibilities to reduce that cap including a change to the <br /> 28 capital equipment levy, use of fund reserves, a reduction in the cost of civil and criminal <br /> 29 legal costs, and employee furloughs. Shared services and cooperative agreements are a <br /> 30 good long term approach and possibilities in that area being explored however that can't <br /> 31 help much in the short term. Mr. Rolek noted that personnel costs are the biggest part of <br /> 32 the city's budget. Administrator Karlson asked the council to keep in mind that most city <br /> 33 employees are union represented so many changes must be negotiated. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Health insurance costs were discussed. Administrator Karlson distributed a chart <br /> 36 indicating current and 2012 costs and percentages. The figures use a presumed increase <br /> 37 of 14% (actual increase is not yet known). He indicated that the city's HSA contribution <br /> 38 and the employee cost for single coverage is guaranteed under contract through 2012 so <br /> 39 wouldn't be areas the council should consider changing. The Mayor indicated that he <br /> 40 understands it is difficult to make changes for 2012 but he is interested in what can be <br /> 41 done with the following year, including understanding what other cities are doing. A <br /> 42 council member noted that government has to be a leader in the area and get the best <br /> 43 bargain for the money spent; he sees some reduction the city contribution to the HSA <br /> 44 account as a future possibility as well as the city paying a lower percentage of the <br /> 45 premium. The council also discussed the waiver of coverage option. The council <br /> 1 <br />