05/19/1976 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Page 2 4 May 19, 1976 Mr. Nadeau felet the* MOP. Brokke hada etthq bought the property thinking it wa* commercial believing** mutt use the Land for thst purpose (Mr. Nadeau felt he could get his money back if the tend ihad been sold under these conditions) or he knowingly bought the land end felt he could use It for commercial purposes. Mr. Karth said he is only asking for a special use permit for just nine months and Mr. Nadeau replied that Mr. Brokke isn't going to comply to the special use permit. Mr. Karth noted, if at the end of the special use permit he hasn't complied with the stipulations, the Planning and Zoning Board would handle the problem at that time. Mr. Nadeau said Mr. Brokke could use the driveway on the Centerville side of the property. Mr. Brokke said the property has piles of dirt and debris and is being cleared by W. & G. Rehbein. If he used the Centerville driveway, his vehicles would interfer with the clearing away of this material. Mr. Kelling asked Mr. Brokke if the special use permit is granted, will he move the vehicles back far enough so they are on the Centerville property? Mr. Brokke said there is a pipe marked in the street and he has told the drivers they must be beyond that marker. Mr. Brokke felt that the trucks are being parked on the Centerville property. Mr. Kelling said the Board had Listened to both men and had neither believed nor 'isbelieved either man, but felt that enough information had been heard to come a reasonable conclusion. ��. Brokke interrupted to say that he had considered buying land from Mr. Nadeau. The asking price was $1000.00 per acre but when contacted for a contract for deed, Mr. Nadeau was asking $3500.00 per acre and wanted cash. Mr. Brokke said the land would not pass a perc test. This is the only reason he contacted the people in Centervitie and purchased their land. Mr. Brokke felt that Mr. Nadeau knew what the land was to be used for when he was contacted to sell. Mr. Kelling repeated this Board should come to some conclusion. Mr. Nadeau said the issue is not clarified. He felt Mr. Brokke is using a residence as a comm- ercial establishment in a residential area. He has his telephone listed at that address and also has a sign attached to his mailbox, and Mr. Nadeau felt this constituted a commercial usage. Mr. Brokke was told the parking of the 9000# pick up in his driveway is a violation of the Ordinance which limits the weight to 7000#. There has been c. -me discussion on the revision of this ordinance, but it has not been considered Eo date. r. Hill moved to recommend to the Council this special use permit be approved r;'ith the stipulation that all vehicles over 7000# gross weight be parked on the Centerville property using the Lino Lakes property for access purposes onty and this special use permit will expire December 31, 1976. The existing sign to be checked by the Building Inspector. Motion was seconded by Mr. Karth. Mr. Nadeau asked if there is to be a limit on the cars to be parked at the property? Mr. Karth said there is no law that says the number of vehicles parked at a certain location can be limited. ` Mr. Karth called for the vote. Motion carried with all present voting in favor with Mr. Nadeau abstaining.