My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/17/1969 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1969
>
12/17/1969 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2022 8:29:55 AM
Creation date
9/29/2017 3:12:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
12/17/1969
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(3) <br />Mr. Dahl asked if there was any objection to his leaving the trailer there if he <br />was not living in it since it would be hard to move this time of year. Mr. Locher <br />IlOr stated this was permissable. <br />At 9:40 the hearing for Joseph Schmitz was called to order. Mr. Locher read the <br />affidavits, showing the address at which the trailer is presently. parked to be <br />6309 Hodgson Road, this being part of Lot 14, Arthur E. Thom Acres. Mr. Locher <br />stated that he had examined the abstract and had a certified copy of the deed with <br />him. He had found no easement to the road; therefore the parcel is landlocked. <br />Mr. Schmitz stated that he had paid $15 for an easement. However, this is not on <br />record. Mr. Locher stated that at best he was using en 8' easement to the next <br />lot. He mentioned that the Courts had upheld the Council's denial of a request for <br />a building permit on a 20' easement. Mr. Schmitz stated he had tried to get a <br />building permit and could not. <br />Mr. Schmitz did not apply for a temporary permit for the trailer and has been there <br />since Sept. 1. Mr. Cardinal asked him if he wasn't told at the Council meeting to <br />get a temporary permit but Mr. Schmitz stated he didn't know anything about this. <br />Mr. Rehbein asked him what reason he had for parking his trailer there. Mr. ScbbzniiiL <br />stated that he had bought his trailer in Wisconsin so that he could park it any- <br />where and then found no room in any of the courts. He has a well and septic tank. <br />Mr. Rehbein moved that the P&Z recommend to the Council that they deny the request <br />of Mr. Joseph Schmitz for a special use permit for his trailer because there was <br />no hardship caa;the parcel was landlocked. Seconded by Mr. Kelling. The motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Rehbein moved that since Mr. Schmitz had brought in the trailer without looking <br />into the ordinances, the P&Z recommend to the Council that Mr. Schmitz be given a <br />30 -day notice to move his trailer out. Seconded by Mr. Karth. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />Mr. Schmitz stated that the check for $100 was in the mail. <br />Mr. McLean asked Mr. Locher to read the trailer revision passed by the Council. <br />Mr. Locher stated that he did not have it with him and also stated that the new <br />amendment was not in effect since any amendment to Ord. 6 requires two weeks <br />published notice before adoption. The notice will be published on the 26th and <br />Jan. 2nd; the Council could consider the matter on the 12th. <br />Mr. McLean stated that Naegele had not brought in any application forms for the <br />Jandric signs (Chamonix); but that the matter was still pending. If they granted <br />the special use permits then Naegele could come in later for the permits. <br />After discussion Mr. Kelling moved that the P&Z recommend to the Council that they <br />grant a special use permit for Naegele to put up 3 signs for Chamonix at the fol- <br />lowing locations: on Birch across from 7th Ave.; on Hwy 49 at Birch St., and on <br />Hwy 49 at Old Hwy 8 near the Apple Inn, subject to the new fee schedule. Seconded <br />by Mr. Jester. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Mr, James Bratland, representing Brede, Inc. came forward to change his request for <br />All signs. Since the two signs he had requested were lesathan 1200' apart, he wished <br />to enlarge the size of the sign and advertize both on the same one and withdraw one <br />application. The request was for a sign on the Midland-Videen property on the end <br />Oak Lane. Mr. Bratland showed the location on a map and produced the lease agree- <br />ment. He was asked to bring a copy of the lease agreement to the Council meeting. <br />The lease was for 3 years and included a clause that in case of land improvement <br />the sign would be removed within 3Q days. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.