12/17/1969 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

(2) and hoped to make some sales by April crMay. Mr. Locher noted that they would need a special use permit for the town.houses. The plat is on the Council agenda for Monday night. The plat contains 49.7 acres. Mr. Busch felt that they would rather contribute money than the land (about 5 acres) so that the Village might use it for the development of the Lake Amelia site. He felt the Village would rather have one large park than so many scattered in the development --besides the golf course. Mr. Cardinal replied that the Council seemed more in favor of several smaller parks rather than one large one. At 9:00 p.m. Mr. McLean mentioned that it was time to hear the special use applicants J3+gager, it was decided to wait on this and finish the Meyers sign applications fircJ. Mr. Locher stated that there was plenty of land for the signs --about 4100 feet. He also stated that no mailings or special hearings were required for this type of special use permit. After more discussion Mr. Jester moved to recommend to the Council that Meyers S.;{ Service, Inc. by granted e special use permit to erect three signs on the Herbert E. Schmuck property along 135W being located in lots 6, 13, 15 and 16 (known as Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 49), Section 2 and the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 10; the location of sign (1) to be placed in the extreme SW corner of the property within the legal setback; the location of sign (2) to be 1200' NE of (1); sign (3) to be 1200' NE of (2); subject to the new fee schedule. Seconded by Mr. Karth. Mr. Rehbein questioned whether the sign could be removed under the 15 -year lease if new development should occur. Mr. Foreman stated that the lease contained a clause making the removal of the sign automatic if development should occur. Also, the annual fee for the signs and the ordinance would control this. The vote on the motion was unanimous in favor. The hearing for Mr. Dahl was called to order about 9:15 p.m. Mr. Locher showed the affidavits were in order. Mr. Dahl stated that he only leases the property and this was good until June. He had no plans to buy the property; he wanted the trailer there to protect his livestock; he is living in it. Mr. Dahl presented the Clerk with $100.00 toward the special use permit fees; a receipt was written. There was considerable discussion with Mr. Dahl. Mr. Locher read the portion of Ord. 6 per- taining to getting rent for a trailer --this would constitute a trailer park. Mr. Dahl has a temporary permit; his request must be considered under the old ordinance since his application was in before the new amendment was adopted. Mr. Rehbein noted that Mr. Dahl violated the ordinance Plf,oby moving in without a permit, also, there is no sewer and water. Mr. Dupre shouldn't have issued the Oct. 13 temporary permit. The Board felt that this was no hardship case. Mr. Locher stated that we needed a statement from the owner of the property that he is receiving no rent for the trailer, but for the lease of the whole parcel. After more discussion Mr. Husnik moved that the P&Z recommend to the Council that they deny the request of Mr. Verner Dahl for a special use permit for his trailer for reasons above. Seconded by Mr. Kelling. The vote was unanimously in favor. Mr. Locher mentioned that the Council has now cut off the issuance of temporary trailer permits by the Building Inspector. Mr. Cardinal asked Mr. Dahl if he had told Mr. Dupre that he was renting the property and received an answer of no. Mr. Rehbein moved that the P&Z recommend to the Council that they deny the extension of a temporary trailer permit for Mr. Dahl beyond the existing 90 -day permit which expires on Jan. 13, to park his trailer on the land described in the hearing notice. Seconded by Mr. Husnik. Carried.