Laserfiche WebLink
JT CITY COUNCIL/CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING August 20, 2009 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 46 audit. There has been some legal work in the area of charter amendments currently being <br /> �.. 47 considered by the commission. She provided information also on the commission's <br /> 48 standard "cost of doing business" items such as publication and recording secretary. Ms. <br /> 49 Sutherland also noted an invoice from Attorney Michael Dougherty for a second opinion <br /> 50 on the commission's proposed transparency amendment. It is a case in point that the <br /> 51 commission doesn't have funding for legal services but the city is getting more than one <br /> 52 opinion. <br /> 53 <br /> 54 Commissioner Trehus added that back in the 1990's the commission had an annual <br /> 55 budget of$4,000. A comparison of that as a percent of levy and updated to current day, it <br /> 56 would be in the range of$20,000 for the commission each year. <br /> 57 <br /> 58 A council member noted that the current budget request seemed to be denied by the <br /> 59 council based on a concern about getting a road construction amendment (it was clarified <br /> 60 that just Mayor Bergeson had spoke about that matter). <br /> 61 <br /> 62 A council member explained that his view of the situation is that the commission has a <br /> 63 need for ongoing operational expenses and is requesting additional funds for legal <br /> 64 services in framing charter amendments. In the area of amendments, he'd like to look <br /> 65 forward and hope that the commission and council can work together to bring forward <br /> 66 ideas that will benefit the citizens and save on legal expenses by collaborating. <br /> 67 <br /> 68 There was discussion about the charter amendment process of the previous year. The <br /> ' - 69 citizens' task force had presented a charter amendment, the charter commission had <br /> 70 presented a compromise amendment and then a petition was submitted that was required <br /> 71 to go to the ballot. It became clear that it wouldn't be appropriate to put more than one <br /> 72 amendment on the ballot so the other amendments were dropped by the council. <br /> 73 <br /> 74 Commissioner Storberg remarked that the city spent more than $50,000 on that <br /> 75 amendment process. <br /> 76 <br /> 77 Commissioner Zastrow recalled that the council and commission have traditionally held <br /> 78 joint meetings but it is clear that each body needs their own attorney. <br /> 79 <br /> 80 Commissioner Sutherland pointed out that the charter attorney actually charges less; <br /> 81 Commissioner Drennen suggested that separate attorneys would mean no potential for <br /> 82 conflict of interest. <br /> 83 <br /> 84 A council member added that he still sees the possibility of cost savings in collaboration <br /> 85 on key principals before necessary legal reviews. <br /> 86 <br /> 87 Commissioner Gunderson pointed out the current state of the commission's budget is <br /> 88 about $20, mainly because of the audit expenses; it is an unreasonable situation for them <br /> 89 at this time of the year(two meetings left, advertisements needed for openings). <br /> 90 <br /> 2 <br />