Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION September 8, 2009 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> ` 2 MINUTES <br /> 3 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br /> 4 <br /> 5 DATE : September 8, 2009 <br /> 6 TIME STARTED : 6:35 p.m. <br /> 7 TIME ENDED : 11:35 p.m. <br /> 8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Members Gallup, O'Donnell, <br /> 9 Reinert, Stoltz and Mayor Bergeson <br /> 10 MEMBERS ABSENT <br /> 11 <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Also Present: Acting City Administrator, Dan Tesch; Director of Public Safety, Dave Pecchia; <br /> 14 Community Development Director, Michael Grochala; Public Services Director, Rick <br /> 15 DeGardner; City Engineer, Jim Studenski; City Finance Director, Al Rolek; Economic <br /> 16 Development Coordinator Mary Alice Divine; City Clerk Julie Bartell; City Attorney, Joe Langel <br /> 17 <br /> 18 1. Harvey Karth re: intersection of Lake Drive and Main Street—Mr. Karth presented <br /> 19 data regarding traffic at the intersection and compelled the council to look into additional traffic <br /> 20 controls there. <br /> 21 Engineer Studenski explained that this situation involves the intersection of two county <br /> 22 roadways. He has been in contact with Anoka County in an effort to plan for signaling of the <br /> 23 intersection, however, there are some issues involved regarding the need for additional right of <br /> 24 way/land to upgrade the traffic control. Staff will speak again with the county and will also <br /> 25 prepare a resolution for council consideration. <br /> 26 Mr. Karth indicated that he is aware that there are some issues and he feels that an upgrade <br /> 27 doesn't have to be grandiose. There are many safety concerns at the intersection as seen with the <br /> 28 number of citations that are passed out on average. <br /> 29 2. Charter Commission Audit—Acting Administrator Tesch recalled that when the <br /> 30 council received the results of the audit done on the charter commission by Attorney Michael <br /> 31 Dougherty, they indicated there would be more discussion on several points. Those points are: <br /> 32 the commission's operating guidelines, the commission's bill paying guidelines, data practice <br /> 33 and communications about the commission's work with the residents. Since the council has <br /> 34 reviewed the audit results, Charter Commission Attorney Karen Marty provided a response and <br /> 35 audit Attorney Dougherty has provided a response to her response. <br /> 36 At the request of the council, City Attorney Langel reviewed and opined on the points. He noted <br /> 37 first that charter commissions are governed by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 410, and their role is <br /> 38 also established in that statute. Regarding the matter of what bills the city can and cannot pay for <br /> 39 the charter commission, Mr. Langel said that he agrees with the rationale presented by Attorney <br /> 40 Dougherty in that the commission is a public entity and therefore there are certain things they can <br /> 41 and cannot spend money on. They can spend money on framing amendments to the city charter <br /> 1 <br />