Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION September 8, 2009 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 82 A council member recalled that at the joint meeting there was some discussion about creating <br /> .._ 83 some line items within the commission's budget so that funds would be reserved for operating <br /> 84 expenses. Perhaps a"guidelines and procedures" line item should be added. <br /> 85 Finance Director Rolek noted that the attorney has opined a very narrow scope of how public <br /> 86 funds can be expended by the commission. <br /> 87 Commissioner Sutherland reviewed the budget points. In regard to the outstanding bill to the <br /> 88 charter attorney and using funds to set up guidelines and procedures, City Attorney Langel <br /> 89 referred to the audit report and the interpretation in it that the statute doesn't allow for such <br /> 90 expenditures; the statute may be outdated but it is still the law. There could be some typical <br /> 91 expenses that go along with the activity of framing and amending that could be argued. <br /> 92 When asked if the council could authorize payment of the outstanding bill for attorney services <br /> 93 related to responding to the audit, City Attorney Langel said that, given the statutory language, he <br /> 94 does not believe that is a valid expense that can be paid by the City of Lino Lakes. <br /> 95 There was additional discussion in the area of what the city can and cannot fund with a <br /> 96 determination that costs relating to frame and amend are all that are allowed. A charter <br /> 97 commissioner indicated that they would review their outstanding attorney bill and determine <br /> 98 what is included that relates to frame and amend. <br /> 99 The council will consider the charter commission budget at the September 14, 2009 council <br /> 00 meeting. <br /> 101 4. Kraus Anderson development proposal—Mary Alice Divine introduced Matt <br /> 102 Alexander and development consultant, Kathy Anderson, both representing Kraus Anderson's <br /> 103 proposal to develop a grocery facility on the west side of Hodgson Road at County Road J. Mr. <br /> 104 Alexander explained that meetings on the proposal have been held with the neighborhood and the <br /> 105 county and the next step would be a traffic analysis completed at the expense of the developer. <br /> 106 Mr. Alexander showed display boards indicating the site plan and a head-on view of the <br /> 107 proposed development. They have spent a great deal of time looking at buffering the <br /> 108 development from area residences. The development concept includes the possibility of some <br /> 109 type of housing down the line. They are committed to clear guidelines with the development. <br /> 110 They have talked to the county about potential road improvements and while they are not <br /> 111 prepared to fully fund such improvements, they(the developer)want to do what they can to move <br /> 112 forward. Hence the need for a study and hence their request to hear how the council sees the <br /> 113 proposal. <br /> 114 Ms. Divine added that the city's Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) has been <br /> 115 involved in the process and are recommending that the council support moving forward with a <br /> 116 concept plan for the project. <br /> 117 When a council member asked about the feedback the developers have received from the <br /> 118 neighborhood, Mr. Alexander indicated that response has been across the board from "it's about <br /> 3 <br />