My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03-28-2016 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2016
>
03-28-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 11:48:14 AM
Creation date
3/14/2018 11:38:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
03/28/2016
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 7, 2016 <br />DRAFT <br /> 3 <br />which is coming in low based on actual January and February numbers. He reviewed 89 <br />revenue estimates based on the current pace, an increase of $43,000 above what was 90 <br />included in the budget for 2016. 91 <br /> 92 <br />Director Swenson said that staff is seeking the council’s direction on how to handle the 93 <br />ACE Program administration. One option would be to limit participation to a level that 94 <br />current staff can handle. Another option would be to bring in an additional half-time 95 <br />Community Service Officer (CSO) position. A third option would be to move the 96 <br />administrative function into city hall and staff it with a half-time Office Tech. 97 <br /> 98 <br />Mayor Reinert indicated his reluctance to bring on permanent staff and asked about the 99 <br />possibility of using volunteer staff. 100 <br /> 101 <br />The council discussed the types of violations that qualify for the program and Director 102 <br />Swenson reminded them that there is a requirement of no previous violations. The 103 <br />program is voluntary and not promoted by officers. 104 <br /> 105 <br />Council Member Manthey asked about the possibility of providing the program on-line to 106 <br />save on staff assistance. Deputy Director Swenson indicated that there are outstanding 107 <br />questions at the state level about these type of programs and he believes that having direct 108 <br />staff instruction is an important element. 109 <br /> 110 <br />The council discussed the process of the ACE Program, from ticket to instruction. They 111 <br />discussed the type of violations that would be turned away if the participation was limited 112 <br />due to lack of staff and heard that the majority of the violations are speeding and traffic 113 <br />signals. They discussed the revenue received by the city for a standard ticket versus an 114 <br />ACE program ticket. 115 <br /> 116 <br />Mayor Reinert explained that he has supported the program from its implementation 117 <br />through the previous police chief. He believes in offering an alternative like this when a 118 <br />situation arises like a new driver getting a ticket and then having that impact the whole 119 <br />family through raised insurance rates. 120 <br /> 121 <br />Council Member Kusterman questioned if an administrative person would legally be able 122 <br />to access data to manage the program. Director Swenson explained a process that would 123 <br />allow access to necessary records. 124 <br /> 125 <br />Council Member Rafferty wondered if administering the ACE Program would be 126 <br />beneficial to a CSO in their training. Director Swenson indicated that it is a good 127 <br />element of a full training program. 128 <br /> 129 <br />The council asked if Director Swenson has a recommendation. Director Swenson said 130 <br />he would hate to see a reduction in the program because believes in its benefits. Council 131 <br />Member Manthey suggested that there’s a clear benefit to the people served by the 132 <br />program and also to the city. 133
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.