Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 7, 2016 <br />DRAFT <br /> 4 <br /> 134 <br />The mayor suggested again that a volunteer be involved and also that staff look at ways to 135 <br />make the program more efficient. Director Swenson explained the need to keep the 136 <br />program legitimate at state level view and the need to use staff. The mayor said he is 137 <br />still looking for ways to deal with the program increases without additional staff (i.e. 138 <br />write a computer program, efficiency through automation) and also his review indicates 139 <br />that there is a quarter percent increase in activity versus a half-time person requested. 140 <br />Director Swenson indicated that he isn’t aware of any automation available; he thinks that 141 <br />adequate staffing is necessary. 142 <br /> 143 <br />Council Member Rafferty indicated that his preference, if additional staffing is done, 144 <br />would be a half time CSO because of the training it offers. Finance Director Cotton 145 <br />added that bringing the program into the administrative area would require some 146 <br />additional costs in training and logistics. Council Member Manthey suggested that the 147 <br />duties could be divided among all of the city’s CSOs. 148 <br /> 149 <br />If the council concurs in the option of adding a CSO position, Director Swenson said staff 150 <br />would return to council before hiring. The mayor said he’d like to look at the automation 151 <br />option before bringing on a position; if he’s satisfied that review is complete, he could 152 <br />support the additional position but it would have to be tied to the program staying at a 153 <br />certain level of participation. Director Swenson indicated that, if no additional staffing is 154 <br />authorized presently, the program will have to be scaled back in the meantime because 155 <br />there is not staff to handle the higher level. Council Member Rafferty asked that the 156 <br />council continue to receive information on increases in the program, to see if the 157 <br />estimates are accurate. 158 <br /> 159 <br />The council will hear back on the matter at the next work session in three weeks. 160 <br /> 161 <br />4. 35E Distribution Center Project – Community Development Director Grochala 162 <br />updated the council on a preliminary proposal to build a large distribution facility on the 163 <br />I35E corridor (Main Street and Cedar Street). The proposal was reviewed by the 164 <br />Planning and Zoning Board because it includes some trailer storage that isn’t specifically 165 <br />allowed under the city’s zoning code. The Board suggested an amendment to the city 166 <br />regulations that would allow the trailer parking in certain areas only. The overall project 167 <br />is $18 - $22 million in value and would have to include some road construction (21st 168 <br />Avenue). Mr. Grochala said he anticipates that the proposal will include a request for 169 <br />assistance in the form of tax increment financing to the project so general information on 170 <br />that process is included in the written report. He explained the terms of a tax increment 171 <br />economic development district that would apply. He noted that the capture of increased 172 <br />tax increment for project costs includes taxes that would otherwise go to the school 173 <br />district and the county. The developer would have to meet a “but for” test in order to 174 <br />qualify for tax increment financing. 175 <br /> 176 <br />The mayor asked about transportation and capacity. Community Development Director 177 <br />Grochala explained the daily projection of 40 trucks in and 60 trucks out. As far as 178