My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-02-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
10-02-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 2:23:41 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 12:14:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/02/2017
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />2. There have been more than two reported crashes, per year <br />in the previous two years or, three reported crashes in the <br />previous year of a type correctable with stop sign <br />installation. <br />3. The pedestrian volumes across the minor approach (that <br />which would be stopping) is more than 15 pedestrians per <br />hour during peak traffic hours. <br />4. If the safe stopping sight distance of the minor approach is <br />restricted by less than 100 feet by horizontal and/or vertical <br />roadway alignment or by other permanent obstructions (see <br />figure). <br /> <br />If condition No. 1 and one other condition are met, this intersection would be a <br />candidate for two-way stop sign control. <br /> <br />All-Way Stop Sign Control: <br />1. If the major street traffic volume approaching the <br />intersection for each leg adds up to more than 1,500 <br />vehicles per day and the minor street traffic volume <br />approaches the intersection for each leg adds up to be <br />greater than 750 vehicles per day. <br />2. There have been more than two reported crashes, per year <br />in the previous two years or, three reported crashes in the <br />previous year of a type correctable with stop sign <br />installation. <br />3. If the pedestrian volumes crossing any approach is more <br />than 15 pedestrians per hour during the peak traffic hours. <br />4. If the safe stopping sight distance on the uncontrolled <br />approach is restricted by less than 100 feet by horizontal <br />and/or vertical roadway alignment or other permanent <br />obstructions. <br />5. If the 85th percentile speed in the intersection is greater than <br />35 mph and the highest reported speed with two or more <br />observations is greater than 45 mph. <br /> <br />If condition No. 1 and two other of the five conditions outlined above apply, this <br />intersection is a candidate for all-way stop sign control. <br /> <br />If the intersection meets the requirements, as outlined above, for either a two-way or all-way stop <br />sign control, the intersection is considered a candidate for stop sign control. Based on this <br />analysis and further review by city staff and the Traffic Safety Committee, a recommendation <br />will be made to City Council to either install or not to install the stop sign control. <br /> <br />If the intersection does not meet these requirements no further study would be completed without <br />direction from city council. A letter to the resident requesting the information, outlining the <br />findings will be sent by the City Engineer. This letter will include the City’s policies for appeal <br />of the engineer’s decision. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.