My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-02-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
10-02-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 2:23:41 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 12:14:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/02/2017
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />WARNING SIGN INSTALLATION <br /> <br />Warning signs are a critical signing element which provides information to the motoring public <br />with respect to potential hazards in and or adjacent to the roadway. These signs include all <br />yellow signs with black lettering as outlined in Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control <br />Devices (MnMUTCD) Chapter 2C. Some typical signs that fall into this category are pedestrian <br />crossing signs, school crossing signs, playground signs, curve signs, and other signs associated <br />with the geometrics of the roadway. <br /> <br />Warning signs are primarily for the benefit of the driver who is unacquainted with the roadway. <br />It is very important that these signs be placed in areas in which the sign is truly justified so that <br />drivers believe that the condition does exist. The use of warning signs should be kept to a <br />minimum as the unnecessary use of warning signs tends to breed disrespect for all signs. In <br />situations where the condition or activity is seasonal or temporary, the warning sign should be <br />removed or covered when the condition or activity does not exist. <br /> <br />Policies for installation of warning signs are discussed below: <br /> <br />Analysis Procedure: <br />Step 1: Requests for Warning Signs Evaluations <br />This request can come from either a resident, the City Council, the Traffic Safety <br />Committee, the school district, or from staff observation of a particular condition. If a <br />request is made from a resident, a signed petition of more than 80% of the households <br />within a 300' radius of the location must accompany the request. <br /> <br />Step 2: Data Collection <br />This step in the procedure should include collecting available data as listed below: <br /> • Average Daily Traffic Volume <br /> • Accident Summary <br /> • Site Visit <br /> • Pedestrian Traffic Volumes (if applicable) <br /> • Traffic Speeds <br /> • Site Topography <br /> <br />Step 3: Sign Installation Evaluation <br />An evaluation of the location should be completed to determine if the installation is <br />justified. This procedure for specific types of warning signs is as follows: <br /> <br />1. Crossing Signs (pedestrian, school, etc.) <br />a. Traffic Volume: If a daily traffic volume of a combined 1000 vehicles per <br />day in both directions, exists on the roadway of the crossing or a peak <br />hour volume of a combined 200 vehicles per hour on the crosswalk <br />approaches exist and, <br />b. Crossing Volume: A crossing volume of more than 30 pedestrians per day <br />or 10 pedestrians per peak hour or, <br />c. An 85th percentile speed on the roadway of more than 35 mph and a peak <br />speed of two observations with more than 45 mph or, <br />d. The safe stopping sight distance on the approach to the obstruction is less <br />than 300 feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.