Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES August 14, 2017 <br />DRAFT <br />6 <br />Council Member Kusterman suggested that the final design recommendations will undoubtedly come 224 <br />forward with appropriate reasoning so that information should come forward for Mr. Trehus. 225 <br /> 226 <br />Mr. Trehus showed a map from the 2005 feasibility study showing the project area. What the city 227 <br />proposed then is a lift station and pond in someone’s yard. He asked the city engineer about another 228 <br />idea, utilizing catch basins and storm water being moved by gravity. The alternate plans would take 229 <br />away the lift station. Ms. Hankee said staff is looking at all suggestions being offered by residents. 230 <br /> 231 <br />Mayor Reinert asked how Mr. Trehus’ point affects the action considered by the council tonight. Mr. 232 <br />Trehus asked for no interruption and then left the meeting. Mayor Reinert remarked that the council 233 <br />has to stay on topic based on the agenda, especially when he knows that there will be plenty of time to 234 <br />deal with questions along the way. 235 <br /> 236 <br />Community Development Director Grochala remarked that the bottom line that will guide decisions 237 <br />will be that which is best for those people who are paying for the project. 238 <br /> 239 <br />Council Member Manthey remarked that there will be points all through the design process that 240 <br />allows for explanation for the residents and time for comment. He believes that over time, more 241 <br />clarity will be there. 242 <br /> 243 <br />Council Member Kusterman moved to approve Resolution No. 17-83 as presented. Council Member 244 <br />Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member Rafferty abstained 245 <br />from voting. 246 <br /> 247 <br />6C) Consider Resolution No. 17-84, Accepting Natural Resources Revolving Fund Plan – 248 <br />Community Development Director Grochala reviewed the written report: 249 <br />- Outlining the history of identifying property appropriate for wetland banking; 250 <br />- Review of the benefit to the city of wetland banking; 251 <br />- Previous council consideration to set up a bank; 252 <br />- The planning and certification process for wetland banking; 253 <br />- Environmental Board review and recommendations. 254 <br /> 255 <br />Council Member Maher moved to approve Resolution No. 17-84 as presented. Council Member 256 <br />Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 257 <br /> 258 <br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS 259 <br /> 260 <br />There was no Unfinished Business. 261 <br /> 262 <br />NEW BUSINESS 263 <br /> 264 <br />There was no New Business. 265 <br /> 266 <br />COMMUNITY EVENTS 267