My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05-06-13 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2013
>
05-06-13 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2014 3:45:57 PM
Creation date
5/3/2013 4:50:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/06/2013
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes SWMP | February 8, 2013 Draft | 86 <br />7.0 Financial Considerations <br />Plan implementation tasks are presented in two ways. First are city -wide costs for stormwater related <br />activities that would apply cit y -wide and are not specific to a certain subwatershed. Those costs are <br />further divided into the 12 Issue Categories ident ified during the planning process and reflected in the <br />City’s Local Surface Water Management Plan. For cost estimating, the 12 categories are listed <br />separately, but in the implementation of those activities from a practical stand point, there will be some <br />activities that can be coordinated to facilitate ease of implementation. There has been an effort NOT to <br />duplicate or create redundant funding in these costs estimates, so some efficiency of implementation is <br />included in the costs. <br /> <br />Secondly, implementat ion costs are also provided based on the s ubwatershed. The city contains 15 <br />Subwatersheds of various sizes and complexity and therefore the needs of each will be unique. The <br />management at the Subwatershed level is to reinforce the City’s Comprehensive Pl an approach of <br />developing Resource Management Unit level planning and management at that Subwatershed scale. The <br />top 3 priority subwatersheds have the costs provided with more detail due to their higher likelihood of <br />experiencing growth and development. All the Subwatershed/RMUs will require a more detailed RMU <br />Plan be developed for them to better detail the trunk infrastructure costs needed. Those RMU Plan costs <br />are included in the cost estimate table for approximately half of the RMUs based on the expe cted need for <br />the plans and local issues arising (development, TMDLs, etc.) <br /> <br />Many of the items fall under past activities that have been typically included in the City’s budget for <br />stormwater infrastructure. The City currently has a Surface Water Manageme nt Charge that is updated <br />annually based on the Engineering News Record (ENR ) Index for new development to cover the cost of <br />administration, planning, and trunk/regional infrastructure. It is recommended that this fee, updated with <br />the new cost informatio n, will be used to fund the Subwatershed/RMU Plans. The costs identified in the <br />RMU studies would then be used to update the fee schedule in future years. With each RMU identified <br />individually, the City will have the opportunity to decide if they would l ike the fee schedules different for <br />the various RMUs or combined for a city -wide average. <br /> <br />The remainder of the stormwater funding comes from the general fund of the city which also covers some <br />of the stormwater planning and implementation needs. While th is is common practice in many <br />communities such as Lino Lakes, the more the specialized, user -fee type funds can be used, typically the <br />more stable and adequate the funding is. Other sources of funding and revenue are also worth <br />considering. The creation of a wetland bank as shown in the implementation plan, with time can be self - <br />funded since there is a need for wetland bank credits. Grant opportunities at the state and local (ex. <br />watershed) level can and should be leveraged to relieve local funding press ures and in some cases <br />accelerate implementation.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.