Laserfiche WebLink
Addendum <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />Public Works Site Analysis and Space Needs Study Addendum <br />October 30, 2017 <br />The following information is intended to expand on information provided in the original study dated <br />April 11, 2017, to provide a more in-depth discussion of Layout Option Al, the remodeling and <br />expansion of the existing City of Lino Lakes Public Works facility. The information in this Addendum <br />does not change the space needs data, schematic layout design, estimated costs or other information in <br />the original study; but instead provides a more comprehensive view of the background on which the <br />data, design and cost estimates were based. The Addendum also reviews broad cost potentials for <br />future expansion labeled Phase II in the study. <br />Existing Public Works Remodeling Scope <br />The remodeling of the existing Public Works facility is shown in the study to be a relatively complete <br />interior gutting and rebuilding along with exterior envelope upgrades. To expand on this it is necessary <br />to consider how the building code evaluates maintenance versus remodeling. <br />First of all, ongoing maintenance of an existing building does not trigger code updates. However, <br />maintenance of an existing building only allows minor ongoing operational items such as changing light <br />bulbs (not fixtures), painting, recarpeting, patching an existing roof or repairing existing mechanical <br />units. Replacement of roofing systems, new mechanical units, replacement of light fixtures, and similar <br />upgrades however are specifically excluded from the maintenance definition and are instead considered <br />remodeling. <br />In comparison, the Minnesota State Building Code and referenced International Building Code require all <br />remodeled portions of a building to fully comply with current building code requirements. Further, if <br />the scope of a remodeling is such that the majority of the existing facility is remodeled, then the entire <br />facility is required to be brought into compliance with the current building code standards. Under these <br />provisions, the proposed remodeling and expansion of the existing Public Works facility as represented <br />in Layout Option Al would trigger a complete code compliant end result. <br />Finally, any items that are not in compliance with ADA accessibility standards, MPCA regulations, OSHA <br />safety standards or other similar safety, environmental, and civil rights requirements are not <br />"grandfathered" or allowed to remain noncompliant until a future remodeling date, but instead are to <br />be addressed when identified. <br />When reviewing the existing Public Works facility, see pages 28 through 33 for a general summary, it <br />was determined that the scope of code noncompliant spaces is such that no interior room was <br />reasonably reusable in its current basic existing condition due to configuration, construction or <br />operational deficiencies. This level of noncompliance was more extensive than was anticipated prior to <br />CNH <br />ARCHITECTS <br />