01-14-2019 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MINUTES December 10, 2018 DRAFT 162 Council Member Maher moved to accept the donation as recommended. Council Member Stoesz 163 seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 164 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT 165 166 There was no report from the Public Services Department. 167 168 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT 169 6A) Watermark: i.) Consider Resolution No. 18-143, Approving PUD Final Plan/Final Plat; 170 ii) Consider Resolution No. 18-144, Approving Master Development Agreement; iii) Consider 171 Resolution No. 18-145, Approving 1st Addition Development Agreement — City Planner Larsen 172 reviewed a PowerPoint presentation including information on: 173 - Council action items; 174 - December 3rd work session discussion; 175 - Overview of PUD Development Stage Plan; 176 - PUD Final Plan; 177 - Housing Types and Products proposed; 178 - Architectural Standards; 179 - Landscaping; 180 - Parks and Open Space; 1 s 1 - Development Agreements; 182 - Recommendation of Environmental and Planning & Zoning Board. 183 Mayor Reinert remarked that he is hearing staff say that the developer can change the plans. Is that in 184 the development agreement? 185 City Attorney Squires noted that the development agreement (discussed at the work session) and the 186 core values statement that is contained within the agreement includes language allowing for developers 187 to request changes but there is no obligation for the City Council to grant those requests. Mayor 188 Reinert asked if the agreement denotes what changes can be requested. Attorney Squires noted Article 189 4 of the Master Development Agreement that identifies the features that could be subject of a change 190 (he noted public park language as an example). 191 192 Mayor Reinert remarked that Watermark is a project that may be under development for a decade. It's 193 important to understand that flexibility. There will no doubt be future turnover on the council and that 194 could represent something different than the spirit intended by this council. He asked how the council 195 could put a lasso around this to keep such things as density and housing type as they are presented now. 196 197 Attorney Squires responded. He believes the Master Development Agreement will bind the entire 198 project together. Could a future council's action be determined now; his response would be that you 199 cannot bind the hands of a future council. But the agreement is saying "this is our vision of the entire 5