My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
1979-056K Council Ordinances
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Ordinances
>
1979
>
1979-056K Council Ordinances
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2019 11:12:50 AM
Creation date
3/25/2019 2:37:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Ordinances
Meeting Date
12/10/1979
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Ordinance #
56K
Ordinance Title
Amending Ordinance No. 6, Relating to Building Requirements, Rezoning certain property to General Business & Light Industrial
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
..arton-Aschman Associates, Inc. <br />Ten Cedar Square West/Cedar-Riverside, 1610 South Sixth Street, Minneapolis, Minn. 55404 612-332-0421 <br />November 20, 1979 <br />Mr. Ken Gourley, Chairman <br />Planning and Zoning Board <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />1189 Main Street <br />Lino Lakes, MN 55014 <br />Re: Sketch Plan. Commercial/Industrial Subdivision (Land and Oaks Inc.) <br />Dear Mr. Gourley: <br />I have reviewed the proposed subdivison and discussed it with Ken Tschida, the <br />developer. The following comments summarize may brief initial review. <br />1. The proposed commercial and industrial land use is generally consistent with <br />the City's draft Land Use Plan. According to the developer, the precise <br />location of the three commercial lots is felxible as long as the frontage along <br />CSAH 14 remains about the same. Before finally tying down the commercial <br />lots the City may wish to review any proposed uses to the east and west of <br />the property in an effort to align the commercial lots with a consistent <br />adjacent land use. <br />2. The mixed commercial and industrial land uses and the odd shape of the <br />property dictate that special care be taken in reviewing this proposal. The <br />two large industrially zoned pieces (15.5 acres and 20.3 acres) will have <br />limited frontage relative to their size. An ultimate development plan should <br />be prepared for this property to illustrate how these large parcels will be used <br />and how access will be provided. <br />3. Control of driveway cuts along CSAH 14 is important in minimizing traffic <br />disruptions. The City's draft Thoroughfare Plan policies reinforce the need <br />for such control. Mr. Tschida mentioned that he has already met with the <br />Anoka County Highway Department to discuss the access issue. The City <br />should require a sign -off from Anoka County documenting their recommended <br />access arrangements. The City should also consider the possibility of a future <br />frontage road for the proposed commercial areas on both sides of Main <br />Street. Although it may not be practical to develop a frontage road now, the <br />City should consider some provision for one in the future. This could be done <br />by simply requiring a deeper front yard setback, deep enough for a proper <br />setback if a frontage road is ever built. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.