My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
1981-056U Council Ordinances
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Ordinances
>
1981
>
1981-056U Council Ordinances
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2019 11:18:01 AM
Creation date
3/29/2019 10:15:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Ordinances
Meeting Date
03/23/1981
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Ordinance #
56U
Ordinance Title
Amending Ordinance No. 6, by Rezoning Certain Real Estate to Light Industrial (Rehbein)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.-Council Meeting <br />February 23, 1981 <br />Page Two <br />Mr. Schumacher recommended that the publication be as requested. This can <br />/"41gen be decided at the Public Hearing. <br />Mr. McLean moved to set a public hearing for the rezoning of Lots 1 thru 10,�I <br />Lots 1 thru 11 as LI, and Lots 12,13, & 14 to HI for March 23, 1981 at <br />8:00 P.M. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Nort wes ern Bell Variance Request <br />Mr. Schumacher presented the proposal of this company for a building of <br />17x18, on a 50' parcel and having only a 20' setback from Birch Street. <br />This parcel of land is located approximately 300' West of Centerville Road <br />on Birch Street. <br />Mr. McLean asked if the property would be sodded and Mr. Dokken felt that <br />because of the configuration of the property, it would be left as is. Mr. <br />McLean asked if this would be fenced and Mr. Dokken said the adjoining land <br />owner would be using a portion of the property for a turn around and would <br />probably use it for grazing cattle. <br />Mr. Dokken said this will be a radio facility for the storage of anumber of <br />cables that will increase the telephone capacity for this area. <br />There was discussion of the landscaping of the area - the driveway - the <br />possibility of conforming with the set back regulations. Mr. Dokken said <br />that when they have a survey done, they will also have contour maps done. <br />/'\ <br />McLean moved to table this request until these maps are done and the <br />Council has more information. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion <br />carried unanimously. Mr. Dokken will call the office when he has the <br />information and will be put on the agenda. <br />Ostrom Variance Request. <br />This request is for permission to allow a garage to remain nearer the street <br />than the principle building. The garage had been constructed without a <br />permit. Mr. Ostrom said he did not know he needed a permit - he thought <br />this was included in the permit for construction of the home. <br />Mr. Short had reviewed this matter and had recommended that this provision <br />in the Ordinance be revoked and that garage be allowed nearer the street <br />than the home. The Planning and Zoning Board had recommended on a 4 to 1 <br />vote that the Council amend the Ordinance to allow this. <br />Mr. McLean felt that amending the Ordinance is not the answer to this - <br />this is piecemealing the Ordinance. <br />Mr. Jaworski questioned the owners as to why the building is where it is <br />and Mrs. Ostrom said that when they bought the lot they were told that a <br />street would be put in on the North line of the lot - so they built their <br />home to face North and used Sunset - which is the West line - for an <br />" dress. They built the garage on the West side of the house also facing <br />firth. At the time they built, Leonard was not in. Mr. Jaworski suggested <br />they move their driveway from Sunset to Leonard and this would eliminate <br />the problem. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.