My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/11/1979 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1979
>
07/11/1979 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2019 11:08:13 AM
Creation date
7/15/2019 1:24:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
07/11/1979
P&Z Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 <br />Planning and Zoning <br />July 11, 1979 <br />3. Comprehensive Sewer Plan. Mr. Gotwald is working on this. <br />4.. Drainage. This has to be dealt with fairly soon. Mr. Gotwald is <br />drawing up some preliminary estimates as to the cost for developing <br />this plan. This would be a Comprehensive Drainage and Ponding Plan, <br />and along with that would be developed a map for the Building Depart- <br />ment that would set a minimum elevation for basements in a specific <br />district. Mr. McLean brought up that if benchmarks were established <br />for the lakes, it would help in developing this map.. <br />5. Wetlands. Mr. Gotwald is preparing this as previously presented to <br />the Planning and Zoning Commission. <br />6. Transportation (roads). Mr. Gotwald is working on this. <br />7. The 5-acre reqirement. <br />8. Review park dedication requirements. Mr. McLean suggested removing <br />the need for commercial and industrial park dedications. <br />9. Protection of commercial zones. The possibility of rezoning areas <br />that are zoned commercial but have residential development to allow <br />for the residential only was suggested. The commercial or industrial <br />zoning would be made up for elsewhere. Breaking up the strip zoning was <br />also suggested. Reevaluating zone uses (not allowing lesser use) <br />was considered. To avoid future problems, the agricultural zoning, <br />which allows R-1 only, should be zoned specifically (R-1, R-2, etc.) <br />So people know exactly what type of area they are moving into. <br />10. Adopt shoreline management. This dealswith pollution and so forth, <br />and the location of houses near the shore; there is also classifica- <br />tion of the lakes by type, which defines the use and development <br />around them. <br />11. Third soil type. Soils of a "severe condition for building" type <br />had been modified to "Severe" and marginal, and there had been a <br />request to be more restrictive. Mr Reinert felt the Soil Conservation <br />Service's soil surveys should be followed. <br />12. Attennas. Some committments had been made to WCCO an atenna situation <br />and there was another request for an antenna from KSTP--they want to <br />lease some land from the company that owns the present antenna and <br />put one up on Birch Street. NorthwestwernBell's microwave attenna <br />is down and there was a question as to whether there was ever a dem- <br />olition permit. <br />13. WCP--40--this is in reference to sewers. WCP--40 is the state <br />pollution control requirement for all on -site sustems. <br />14. Hangars in the Air Park. There was a committment to review a request <br />to allow hangers in the Air Park. <br />15. House numbers. There is an old request from the Council to develop <br />a house numbering policy in the application of numbers to vacant land. <br />There is also some trouble areas that were misnumbered that needs to <br />be straightened out. This affects both street names and numbers.. <br />The present problem makes it difficult for fire and police services. <br />16. Sign Ordinance. The city theoretically has a choice of adopting its <br />own sign ordinance and having it certified by the state or adopting <br />the state ordinance. Apparently the state has never certified any <br />of the local sign ordinances. There had been someone out to check <br />on the ordinance, but it was not yet certified, and there was some <br />question as to whether it would be. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.