Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Anoka County 2019 <br />Multi-Jurisdictional <br />All Hazards Mitigation Plan <br /> <br /> 245 <br />• 1 – No obvious source of funding available and action has significant <br />cost impact. <br />• 2 – Limited or unknown funding available. <br />• 3 – Little or no funding required or funding can be readily obtained. <br /> Maintenance/Operations L=3 <br />• 3 – Action requires limited or no ongoing maintenance. Jurisdiction <br />has demonstrated ability to perform this action. <br />• 2 – Unknown or action has the potential for moderate ongoing <br />maintenance. <br />• 1 – The action is likely to require high level of ongoing maintenance. <br /> <br />• POLITICAL <br /> Political Support – L=1 <br />• 1 – Local Elected Official likely to be contentious <br />• 2 – Local Elected Official may be controversial <br />• 3 – Local Elected Official likely to be supportive <br /> Local Champion – L=1 <br />• 1 – Unlikely there is a Local Elected Official to support <br />• 2 – Uncertain if there is a Local Elected Official to champion <br />• 3 – A Local Elected Official is likely to support and champion <br /> Public Support – L=1 <br />• 1 – Public Political support is unlikely <br />• 2 – Public Political support is uncertain <br />• 3 – Public Political support is likely <br /> <br />• LEGAL <br /> State Authority Exists – L=1 <br />• 1 – No legal state authority exists <br />• 2 – Legal state authority is unclear, uncertain or adoption is in <br />progress <br />• 3 – Legal state authority exists <br /> Local Authority Exists – L=1 <br />• 1 – No legal authority exists <br />• 2 – Legal authority is unclear, uncertain or adoption is in progress <br />• 3 – Legal authority exists <br /> Potential Legal Challenge L=3 <br />• 3 – Low (likelihood of legal challenge by stakeholders.) <br />• 2 – Moderate (likelihood of legal challenge by stakeholders.) <br />• 1 – High (likelihood of legal challenge by stakeholders.) <br /> <br />• ECONOMIC (Multiple actions that are contingent upon each other will receive the <br />same ranking.) <br /> Action Benefit L=1 <br />• 1 – Low (benefit to the jurisdiction from the action.) <br />• 2 – Moderate (benefit to the jurisdiction from the action.) <br />• 3 – High (benefit to the jurisdiction from the action.) <br /> Action Cost L=3 <br />• 3 – Low cost to implement action. <br />• 2 – Moderate cost to implement action.