08-12-2019 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Anoka County 2019 Multi-Jurisdictional All Hazards Mitigation Plan 246 • 1 – High cost to implement action.  Economic Goal Contribution L=1 • 1 – Low contribution to other community economic goals. • 2 – Moderate contribution to other community economic goals. • 3 – High contribution to other community economic goals  Outside Funding Required L=3 • 3 – Unlikely for action to be delayed pending outside sources of funding. • 2 – Possible for action to be delayed pending outside sources of funding. • 1 – Likely for action to be delayed pending outside sources of funding. • ENVIRONMENTAL  Land/Water Effect L=3 • 3 – Low likelihood of potential negative consequences to land and water resources. • 2 – Moderate likelihood of potential negative consequences to land and water resources. • 1 – High likelihood of potential negative consequences to land and water resources.  Endangered Species Effect L = 3 • 3 – Low likelihood of potential negative consequences to endangered species. • 2 – Moderate likelihood of potential negative consequences to endangered species. • 1 – High likelihood of potential negative consequences to endangered species.  Hazmat Waste Site Effective L=3 • 3 – Low likelihood of potential affect on hazardous materials and waste sites. • 2 – Moderate likelihood of potential affect on hazardous materials and waste sites. • 1 – High likelihood of potential affect on hazardous materials and waste sites.  Environmental Effect L=3 • 3 – Yes, project is consistent with jurisdiction environmental goals. • 2 – Possibly, project is consistent with jurisdiction environmental goals. • 1 – No, project is not consistent with jurisdiction environmental goals.  Federal Law Compliant L=3 • 3 – Yes. • 2 – Uncertain. • 1 – No.