Laserfiche WebLink
Well House No. 7 Feasibility Study <br />City of Lino Lakes, MN <br />WSB Project No. 013434-000 Page 3 <br />3. TEST WELL BACKGROUND <br />During the 2008 Water Supply Plan review, the City was pre-approved for two additional production wells, <br />Well No. 7 and 8. In 2017 the DNR was ordered to take measures to immediately amend all <br />appropriations permits within a 5-mile radius of White Bear Lake, which resulted in the suspension of the <br />original approval. As of 2019, DNR approval is still suspended pending additional information from test <br />wells, which are recommended to examine a site for geologic conditions, potential well interference, water <br />quality, and aquifer capacity. <br />In the Spring of 2019, Anoka County provided the City of Lino Lakes access to the site for the <br />construction of Test Well No. 7. The southwestern corner of the property was chosen for a future <br />production well based on future site layouts provided by Anoka County, local geology, topography, and <br />proximity to existing utilities. Two test wells were constructed on the southwest corner of the 509 Birch <br />Street property. Both test wells were termed Test Well No. 7, however the first attempt was sealed after it <br />failed during drilling. Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) assigned the failed Test Well No. 7 the Well <br />and Boring Sealing Unique Number 841553. The second Test Well No. 7 was successful and was <br />assigned Well and Boring Unique Number 843388. Well and boring reports for both wells are included in <br />Appendix B. <br />3.1 TEST WELL RESULTS <br />Test Well No. 7 was completed as an open hole well (no screen installed) in the Jordan Sandstone <br />(Jordan) formation in the southwest corner of the site (see Figure 1). This location on the property was <br />determined acceptable for production Well No. 7 based on the observed geology, potential well capacity, <br />water quality, and absence of adjacent well interference. <br />3.1.1 GEOLOGY <br />The geology in this area typically consists of sand and gravel overlying glacial deposits. Glacial <br />drift and the St. Peter, Prairie du Chien, Jordan, St. Lawrence, Tunnel City, Wonewoc, Eau <br />Claire, and Mt. Simon formations are all present around the Lino Lakes area. The City’s existing <br />wells currently utilize the Prairie du Chien, Jordan, and St. Lawrence formations. <br />The glacial drift at the test well location is unconsolidated Quaternary deposits consisting of <br />layers of fine to pebbly sand, gravel, silt and clay that are approximately 127-feet thick. The <br />glacial drift can be vulnerable to pollution and is not generally used for high capacity production <br />wells due to the high likelihood of domestic well interference. <br />The Prairie du Chien formation in this area is approximately 50-feet thick and is sometimes used <br />for high capacity production wells. At this location, a zone of uncemented limestone, mixed with <br />glacial sands was encountered 10-feet into the Prairie du Chien. The uncemented formation was <br />deemed unstable. <br />The Jordan formation in this area is approximately 105-feet thick and is most frequently used for <br />high capacity production wells within the City. The top part of the formation at the test well <br />location consisted of 10-feet of unconsolidated sandstone and 95-feet of mostly consolidated <br />sandstone immediately below. <br />3.1.2 TEST WELL CONSTRUCTION <br />During the construction of the failed bedrock test well, the well contractor (contractor) drilled <br />approximately 142-feet into the Prairie du Chien formation. The Prairie du Chien formation at this <br />site was uncemented, not stable, and continually collapsed as the contractor attempted to reach <br />the Jordan formation below. The contractor decided to change drilling methods and was able to <br />reach a depth of approximately 187-feet, almost the depth of Jordan formation. During this <br />construction, the well continued to collapse within the uncemented zone and produced sediment <br />filled water. In working with the contractor and another local well drilling contractor, it was <br />concluded that a bedrock test well would not be feasible in this unique formation using cable tool <br />drilling methods. It was recommended that the failed test well be sealed and a screened or <br />bedrock test well be constructed using a rotary drill rig.