Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />APPROVED <br />131 iii) Consider Resolution No. 19-130 Approving Site Improvement Performance Agreement <br />132 Council Member Manthey moved to approve the First Reading of Ordinance No. 09-19 and to approve <br />133 Resolutions No. 19429 as presented. Council Member Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on <br />134 a voice vote. <br />135 Council Member Manthey moved to approve Resolution No. 19-129 as presented. Council Member <br />136 Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. <br />137 Council Member Maher moved to approve Resolution No. 19-130 with the addition of fencing to be in <br />138 place by the end of this year and required paving to be in place by June 30, 2020. Council Member <br />139 Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. <br />140 6C) Consider Resolution No. 19431 Approving Watermark PUD Development Stage Plan <br />141 Amendment #3-Architectural Design Standards — City Planner Larsen reviewed a Powerpoint <br />142 presentation inclduing information on the following: <br />143 - History (council actions); <br />144 - Resolution includes language related to garage requirements; <br />145 - Proposed Amendment related to the garage protrusion; <br />146 - Plans (indicating garage length, not to exceed 67% of the fagade of the house); <br />147 - Elevations (four that they will offer, all to meet the 67% requirement); <br />148 - Planning and Zoning Board recommendations. <br />149 Council Member Rafferty asked about clearance within the width of the garage; it appears to be <br />150 narrow. The developer noted that each stall would be 10 feet at a minimum. Josh Metzer, Lenar, <br />151 explained that these series of homes are sold in many communities and he hasn't heard any <br />152 discussion about the width of the garages; for the people that are buying the homes, it seems like the <br />153 garage space is sufficient. <br />154 Mayor Reinert remarked that it's common to want to a larger garage. It's understandable and <br />155 would be great to get a larger garage for this development. The city 's advisory group supports the <br />156 change unanimously. <br />157 Council Member Maher asked, regarding the Portland model, is the garage fagade even or is the <br />158 single stall brought out? The developer responded that the third stall is required to be recessed. <br />159 <br />160 Council Member Manthey moved to approve Resolution No. 131 as presented. Council Member <br />161 Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. <br />162 <br />163 UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />164 <br />165 There was no Unfinished Business. <br />166 <br />167 NEW BUSINESS <br />168 <br />169 There was no New Business. <br />170 <br />171 COMMUNITY EVENTS <br />0 <br />